if you think patsocs are not interested in decolonization again you're just glazing over what differentiates them from "maga communists" who don't give a fuck about reservations or minorities
i talk to them for the same reason they talk to maga communists, i know when people's work on their ideas is incomplete, based on the shortcomings of their strategies and their incoherent statements. if it doesn't work, it doesn't. just closing off a conversation with weird online lingo is not impressive to me. you're already ready to dismiss me.
the impression you are working on a mass movement, secretly, deep down, has to be laughable even to you. so don't tell me how to do it or think you've imparted the impression on me you're even interested.
i'm a lot more involved with what most claim to think is the best option in the US anyways, that's why i'm critical of it. which is strange considering I see UAW and Teamsters stuff get uncritical huggies and kissies on this site
Unions, even american unions, get at least critical support on this site, even if they often have terrible views on decolonization and the global south, because they are at least trying to improve conditions for some workers. Patsocs and maga communists (the same thing) work only for feds and landlords.