I have every reason to be "mean" to you. Even if you can't read Twitter screenshots, it's pretty clear as to what this is about just by reading the post's title, so your comment comes across as defensive. That's not my fault.
A lot of their (Midwestern Marx) takes as a group are actually just fine, but the bad ones some of their members hold are just really bad, and the fact that the rest of the Midwestern Marx group allows them to remain affiliated says a lot about them.
As an example, Eddie is dismissive of concepts like landback on the grounds that it happened a long time ago, which is a really bad take. It’s made into an even worse bad take when this idea is not universally applied in his worldview. As a socialist, calling it chauvinist would probably be the nicest thing you could say about it.
Yes I do know midwestern marx is a collective, hence the varying pronoun use in my comment. I guess I just wasn’t clear enough about that which is my bad. I’ll edit accordingly