Not saying he's innocent anything like that but 30 years for a little date rape is kinda extreme when you consider the Raiders DB who killed a woman while driving 150+ mph while drunk, he is serving 3-10.
This is the wrong take. Instead of saying he got too much time for "date rape" (and considering the harrowing story of Jane Doe 1 and the way it was suppressed by the Church of Scientology I'm not so sure you've read about the severity of these charges) you should ask why a drunk driver got so little time.
But killing one person drunk driving is a less severe crime than a serial rapist in my opinion.
I usually don't respond to people with 88 in their name but I figured if an ignorant person read your comment without someone addressing it they might get the wrong impression.
He got the max sentence because of his actions in attempting to suppress the victims. That's a malicious, ongoing act. A negligent act usually doesn't get the max sentence.
Holy shit this is the dumbest thing I’ve seen on the internet this week and that is saying something. Do everyone a favor and smash your keyboard. No one needs to read your idiotic thoughts anymore.
30 years is drops in the bucket compared with the horror that he put his victims through. They have to suffer with that trauma, that pain, the mistrust of other human beings, for the rest of their lives.
The fact that you think that any kind of rape at all deserves any amount of leniency is very telling of the kind of person you are.