6个月前

GOG reportedly suffering from staff turnover and poor management: “Current business model is likely running out of steam”

gameworldobserver.com GOG reportedly suffering from staff turnover and poor management: “Current business model is likely running out of steam” | Game World Observer

GOG has reportedly cut dozens of jobs recently. Here are new details about the situation at CD Projekt’s subsidiary and the shortcomings of its business strategy.

GOG reportedly suffering from staff turnover and poor management: “Current business model is likely running out of steam” | Game World Observer

您正在查看单个线程.

268 留言

Too bad, I use Steam and it works wonderfully on Linux, but i don't want it to be the only option.
- i don’t want it to be the only option.
  Neither do I but it is. GOG doesn't support Linux. Heroic is a 3rd party community effort. Valve is currently the only company making financial investments into Linux gaming.
  
  It does support Linux: it lets you download Linux installer for games that have a Linux port.
  The lack of GOG Galaxy on Linux just means you have to manually manage your games.
  
  It does support Linux: it lets you download Linux installer for games that have a Linux port.
  GOG lets publishers upload various installers but GOG does nothing to support them, let alone offer something like Proton (which is open source, so they could take and integrate it for free).
  
  No one needs to "offer" Proton. It's available freely for anyone. I think some people think Proton is a Steam thing. It isn't. Yeah, Valve did a lot of work on it, which is great, but it isn't limited to them. Vlave has essentially unlimited resources, and I'm happy they spent some making improvements for WINE, but GOG does not have nearly the same resources. I wouldn't expect them to put their effort into that. Valve only did because they were building hardware that they wanted to run Linux.
  
  No one needs to “offer” Proton. It’s available freely for anyone.
  And that's how GOG does not support Linux: Paying customers need to figure it out on their own. They don't even value their customers to a degree to take and integrate existing open source solutions.
  
  Is proton entirely FOSS? I do know that they are built on wine, but now that I think about it, I am not sure.
  
  Is proton entirely FOSS?
  Of course it is. Proton-GE and umu wouldn't exist if it weren't.
  but now that I think about it, I am not sure.
  You could have headed to Github and just looked for yourself...
  
  Valve only did because they were building hardware that they wanted to run Linux.
  That was part of it clearly but I think more so they wanted an escape route as Microsoft enshittifies (further)
  
  On steam I can click install and run and most games windows and Linux just work without further effort. This makes gog worthless to me. I could just use wine I don't know why I'd bother.
  
  Many more companies than Valve are making financial investments into Linux gaming, including companies that own various Linux distributions (Red Hat, Canonical, etc.), CodeWeavers (who amongst other things have been contracted by Valve on a lot of Proton work) and to a lesser extent Humble Bundle.
- GOG is the only big option if you want to own the games you purchase.
  
  That's not how copyright laws work anywhere. You don't own anything, it's just a license.
  
  GoG Vault would disagree with you on that.
  You can download the full installers and keep them, nobody can take them away or disable it remotely
  
  What they mean is that technically you still are being granted a license to use it. The same was true for things like DVD movies. They're technically correct, but missing the point.
  
  How is that different from backing up the game folder on steam? In both cases it's true that:
  You're not doing anything illegal at the moment you do it
  You can use it to play the game on a different computer (as long as the game is DRM free which is not granted on either platform)
  The company (Valve/GOG) can't remotely erase your copy
  If the company removes the license from you your backup is now technically illegal but it's unlikely to be enforced
  I fail to see how GOGs approach is any different, they still sell you a license and you're backing up the installer in case the license gets removed and/or you're forbidden from redownloading the game.
  
  So you can just pop that folder on any computer and run it, without installing Steam and without a Steam account?
  
  On most games yes, like I said before I've copied games from my computer to others to play in lan to convince friends to buy a game.
  Then there are badly implemented games, where you need to either delete the steam library from the game folder or replace it with an open implementation.
  And the rest are the ones that have DRM (which are not available on GOG anyways so they don't matter for this discussion).
  
  Actually, some games have DRM on steam and have a DRM free version on GOG. I even saw a game that had a DRM free epic and gog edition but the steam version had DRM. Might be a edge case, but still exists
  
  Yes, there are a couple of corner cases, I know of 1. But what I stated is still true as a general rule.
  
  GoG Vault would disagree with you on that.
  They are free to disagree on laws but they are still bound by them.
  You can download the full installers and keep them, nobody can take them away or disable it remotely
  That's true but if your license is revoked, you're illegally in possession of the game assets.
  
  That's not how it works but hey, you do you
  
  It 100% is how it works. Read that EULA next time you install one of those games via the installer you downloaded from gog.
  
  Yeah & we still get to keep the installers, but hey I seriously do get your point
  
  and?
  
  It’s less clear than you say.
  In principle the First-sale doctrine should apply but it has not caught up with reality yet.
  
  In case of Steam.
  With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.
  
  No you don't. You get the same license as you do on Steam, here's the license btw https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/16034990432541-GOG-User-Agreement-effective-from-17-February-2024?product=gog :
  We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a 'license') to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This license is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this license in some situations, which are explained later on.
  Which is very similar to Steam. In both cases you can keep the files you've downloaded on your machine, and on most cases you can copy those files to a different machine and keep playing it. GOG has better marketing on this regard, but they're both very similar, neither enforces DRM nor forbids it entirely, although GOG does tend to be a bit stricter (but they still allow it) whereas steam is a bit looser but knowingly implemented a weak DRM and let's you know in the game page if the game has any stronger form of DRM.
  
  @Nibodhika @EvilShrubbery Stop Killing Games opened my eyes to the software "ownership" situation. In USA, apparently, noone ever owns any software. It's always licenced. Even if on physical media. Quite bizarre.
  In rest of world it varies but also sucks.
  
  Yup, GOG just has good marketing department and lots of people fall for the DRM-free (but not really) games you own (but not really) campaign.
  
  @Nibodhika It's freaking evil, but in their defence, it's more America's evil than any one business. They have set about systematically reducing freedom for decades.
  
  @Nibodhika @dbat Steam did the exact same thing when it was new when they would say "If Steam ever shuts down, we'll give you perpetual licenses to the games in your game library." Probably around the same time in their existence as GOG hyping DRM-free.
  
  @obsurveyor @Nibodhika from what I have heard, they cannot give licences to Americans, at least. Perhaps to other countries, but they prob never will. I mean if Steam ever was closing down, they wouldn't care.
  
  With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.
  No, the intellectual property is not transferred to you. You have no clue how copyright works.
  
  For most people that is a distinction without a difference.
  
  For most people that is a distinction without a difference.
  So what's the difference to making a backup of my Steam folder? The games I play have no DRM either.
  
  Nothing at all. Most people are not creating derivative works.
  
  Yes, but the same is also true for Steam, so it's a moot point.
  
  I totally understand your point, but when people talk about "you own nothing" they don't really mean you "own" the content on physical media, they mean it doesn't have DRM that requires an online service. You're technically correct, but your pedantry is making you miss the forest for the trees, basically.
  
  But the same is also true for Steam, so it's a moot point.
  
  Nobody is saying otherwise.
  
  but your pedantry is making you miss the forest for the trees, basically.
  No. People here claim, that just because GOG cannot remote wipe your drive, people buying off GOG have a perpetual right to the games they've bought. But they don't because that's not how copyright works. If a game's license is revoked, to keep playing the game is copyright violation.
  Not only do so many people not grasp basic concepts of copyright, they claim Valve could take away all downloaded games. No, Valve cannot remote wipe my drive either. I can back up my Steam folder. Many games on Steam don't have DRM at all. It's opt-in and the actual Steam documentation outright says not to rely on Steam DRM because "it is easily removed by a motivated attacker." If games rely on crap like Denuvo, 3rd party launchers, or invasive anti-cheat, the publishers are required to clearly state so on the store page in one of those orange boxes. Users can make an informed decision on a per-game basis even with Steam. And those games that ship crap like Denuvo aren't on GOG in the first place.
  So in the end GOG is a store that stretches the truth about game ownership in their marketing and despite all their Witcher and Cyberpunk money, they don't care about users of platforms competing against Windows at all.
  
  People here claim, that just because GOG cannot remote wipe your drive, people buying off GOG have a perpetual right to the games they've bought.
  I think it's pretty clear from context that they mean they have the ability to perpetually play the games because of the lack of DRM, not the right.
  
  Again, the same is true for Steam as well, so it's a moot point.
  
  Nobody is saying otherwise.
  
  This is a thread where someone claimed that you don't own the games on Steam but you do on GOG, this is the comment the person was replying to:
  In case of Steam.
  With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.
  So yes, that's exactly what the person is saying. So the fact that GOG can't remotely wipe your drive is a strawman fallacy, because neither can Steam, and the differences between GOG and Steam is what's being discussed, so anything that is the same has no bearing on the discussion.
  
  I think it’s pretty clear from context that they mean they have the ability to perpetually play the games because of the lack of DRM, not the right.
  Plenty claim it's their right and with much ferocity while as vehemently ignoring that there are plenty of games on GOG that offer reduced content when playing offline (an extensive list was posted by someone). Also, because games on Steam must disclose their use of DRM (and anti-cheat), people can just buy DRM-free games which can be backed up just as well. Goldberg is a drop-in library for games that use Steam APIs. So everything is fine there as well for people who actually make informed buying decisions.
  
  Who says you have to respect the laws? Just pirate if publishers mess with players
  
  Just pirate
  What's the point of GOG then?
  
  Morals
  
  Morals
  Nothing moral about a store that affirms Microsoft's Windows monopoly.
  
  People have different morals. It's ok, it's personal
  
  Same reason we have Barnes and Nobles in the states. I like to browse before I hit zlibrary.
  
  We have itch.io
  
  Not everything is on GoG

268 留言