Zelenskyy: Europe has no chance against Russia without Ukrainian military

The opposite is true. The fighting in Ukraine is retarded WWII combat but with drones being the artillery's smaller and (slightly - or for Russians: much more) precise sister. But exactly nobody but Russia (and Ukrainians mostly trained to the same (non-)standard back then) would fight an artillery based trench war in the first place in this day and age.

Contrary to the tales people tell this is NOT a modern war. It's obsolete bullshit caused by the inability of both sides to do better (Russians can't anyway and Ukraine is usually lacking equipment so hard that they can only move very slowly). Yes drones are a thing. And they will stay a thing in the future. But not like in Ukraine because that static fight with lackluster air-defense on both sides is very unique indeed.

But the paper meets all the detailed specifications. The specifications may not be suitable for military use, but they are met.

The greatest threat Russia and Putin pose is the level they've compromised politicians throughout the EU, and the fact they've already successfully compromised big tech oligarchs (now cleared for complicit full scale psychological warfare), who are all bending the knee to fascism so quickly its as though capitalism is destined to result in fascism...

I wouldn't fault them for not doing so. I also wouldn't fault Ukraine for pursuing nuclear deterrence as well. Europe has, frankly, failed to properly equip Ukraine to defend itself with conventional means.

As far as i know, those nukes weren't able to be deployed without the soviet codes. Soviets maintained control both of the launch sequence and operational control. At most, Ukranians could have used parts of them. At the time Ukraine disarmed they had no nuclear program in place to produce more or retrofit the existing nukes to new launch methods. They would have had to start from scratch. It also painted a target on their backs that at the time nobody could have done anything about to protect them. I cannot imagine a better outcome for Ukraine in the present had they chose to keep the non functioning nukes. Russia was going to come for them had they not given them and Ukraine was coming to terms with its own independence happening just 4 years earlier.

So yeah, disarming in this specific situation was the only choice at that time for Ukraine. You can't just grab another country's nukes and use them. They are made specifically so you can't do that, so that they can be deployed in allied countries without significant danger to the manufacturing country.

Are you basically asking if there are Ukrainians with about 2 working brain cells left?

Nukes are totally useless there. What would Ukaine have done? Thrown a nuke at Donbas the moment Russia mass moved troops out of there to annihilate parts of the territory they claim for themselves? Or shot a nuclear armed missile at Moscow in a total escalation probably triggering mutual large scale nuclear destruction?

Ukraine with nuclear weapons would have done exactly the same against an Russian invasion as Russia did when they began to lose territory in Kursk... nothing while loudly talking about how they totally could do it any day now... in hopes some retards in Europe believe that tale.

You really think that the very countries, that are the only thing preventing the ukraine from loosing, wouldn't be able to achieve at least the same results for themself with the more on resources and manpower they have?