Can't adopt, can't get an abortion. Also, can't get divorced.
Can't adopt, can't get an abortion. Also, can't get divorced.
51 comments
-
An eighteen year old woman dating a thirty year old man is considered a victim of grooming. An eighteen year old woman entering a sugar baby arrangement with a fifty year old man is considered an empowered feminist. However if said man provides her with a glass of wine before the deed, that's a class three misdemeanor.
Gender politics in the US is cracked. A huge part of the reason why is the entire discourse is dominated by super reductive hot takes.
-
If she got pregnant it's probably her fault. The number of sexy, sexy nine years olds I've seen walking around dressed provocatively...
/s but please let it be obvious that was sarcasm
-
The horrifying thing is that I have actually seen 9 year olds dressed pretty provocatively, and that just makes me feel more sick to think of gross perverts who find that sexy.
I feel even more sick when I remember being 11 years old and how I perceived the world; a friend (also 11) had a 16 year old boyfriend and I remember we all thought this was the coolest thing, and I wondered whether dressing more provocatively would help me to get a boyfriend. Normalising this shit is like societal level grooming
-
I'm still temped to downvote this anyway because it disgusted me so much.
-
c/nocontext
-
-
Down with the white taliban.
-
You don't need to use the "scary brown people" word to describe conservatives, you know? Call them retrogrades, fascists, misogynist, or the whole plethora of accurate terms instead of invoking mild racism
-
Y'all-Qaeda
-
-
Forgot to add that children can get married and work in dangerous jobs.
-
The divorced part and the link was about child marriages, but you are correct that I did not mention dangerous jobs. I was thinking more about domestic life.
-
-
If you don't see the point it is because you don't hate women enough.
You have to think from the perspective of a J.D. Vance who women (and men but especially women) react with repulsion and disgust towards because thankfully women have better options to get laid than loser bigots (what is the point? just get yourself off at home if you are horny, JD is gonna just blow his load in 10 seconds and fall asleep leaving you there to finish the job yourself anyways), and being rich or powerful doesn't really solve the problem for pathetic, feminism hating incel types like JD because like, even if you are a woman who desperately wants to have access to money and power you still have to know on some level that having sex with JD Vance would be crushingly boring and unfulfilling.
People like JD know this on some level too, they were the kids in school that when popular kids made fun of them for being weird the other kids would look on not with a pity or a blank neutral gaze but with a recognition dawning on their faces that though bullying is bad, this JD Vance type incel being bullied is dangerous and slimey.
They just want to hurt women for laughing in their face when they try to lecture them about how they are objects, it truly is that dumb and pathetic.
-
Is that Bartleby's great great, etc, grandson?
-
He's not Wayne The Scrivener.
Or at least he didn't give his middle name.
-
Front Desk Person: Your middle name, please? Our Guy Wayne: The
-
-
I'd prefer not to.
-
It's in your contract, your job description, even your name; is it time for you to restart your counseling / therapy sessions? Mental health care is health care, after all.
-
-
-
Well, one of those involves killing a baby/something that will become a baby, so that's probably the differentiating factor in legislators' eyes.
-
Ahh you spilt the beans, you shouldnt have. Something that would become a child. Isnt.
-
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/15749980
Btw, is there a better way of posting the same response to multiple comments?
-
-
That slash you used implies that the things before and after it are somehow equivalent when they absolutely aren't.
-
I put it there because people have different opinions on when a human life begins, some think it begins at conception, some after 1st trimester, some at birth... However you define the "thing" growing in the womb as, abortion involves killing it and that's probably(obviously) why it's treated differently than adoption.
-
-
Um no we dont downvote straight up logical clarification you idiots
Helps up and dusts off qwerty*
-
The difference is if she gets pregnant, it was her fault.
-
You’ll have to make the sarcasm more obvious if that is the intentional effect unfortunately.
Look at the Za’Niyah Harris case, and how many comments there are about how “fast” she was. (14 year old girl, impregnated by an adult in his 40’s who had previously given a 4 year an STI. he gave her an abortion, she is dead and no one knows where the body is)
-
the rapist, arguing against abortion rights.
-
this guy obviously got a lot of downvotes, so i don’t want to associate myself with that, or even stick my own neck out... because what's the benefit? maybe i also get a bunch of downvotes? it makes me feel very sketched out. especially as someone who has had to mask their whole life, i have a hard time doing this in public.
but, i think he was joking/sarcastic. i could be wrong, because i am bad at reading social cues... but i've also spent a bunch of time practicing at it, and we people have a hard time detecting sarcasm... but i think this was it.
happy to hear evidence either way.
-
-
You need a /s on that
-
51 comments