Technically retirement age is 65 (might have moved to 67). But don't worry, Republicans have proposed moving the retirement agree to 75. That'd really cut down on the senators part retirement age and they don't even have to retire!
Too be fair, she could have been all there mentally and died from something else. My Great-grandma was very sharp, and very aware when she passed at 82.
If we do an age limit it should be scientifically defined, something like the statistical average age at which mental decline due to old age has set in. Wording it like that will allow the exact age to be flexible with the times if say longevity increases or a generation is born into such harsh environmental conditions that it lowers the average cognitive ability at a younger age than expected.
Mental decline due to old age presently begins to set in noticeably in the mid to late 60s.
Plus, it's better than the present system where authority and paying jobs are held onto for dear life by zombified boomers out of what can only be assumed as sheer spite for the up and coming.
I think just having a cutoff works better, otherwise the test will be constantly scrutinized and attacked and neutered by olds trying to break their way into holding onto power forever in spite of the greater good.
If your boss retires, you're out of a job. Pretty sure Feinsteins top staffer is Pelosi's niece (maybe daughter?) And I doubt she'd have trouble finding a job, but most have a financial incentive to keep their boss in office for as long as possible.
Direct incentive yes but it's to the overall detriment to their position in life at this point. Aren't Feinstein and Pelosi in solid blue districts? There's little risk to "losing" the seat.
Republicans have already made it clear that they won't agree to seat Feinstein's replacement on the judiciary committee. She can resign and be replaced by another Democrat in the Senate at large, but we will get absolutely zero new federal judges.
You can't vote for the first 18 years, why not do the same based on the average life expectancy? That would even add a incentive for older politicians to improve medical care for all!
Oh my... one of the things that made me really uncomfortable on reddit was the open discrimination against the elderly, and now it comes to lemmy, apparently...
Look at the comments. People want even to take the voting rights out from the ederly. Seriously?
You all have to realize that what we need isn't less voting rights, but better POLITICAL EDUCATION! The elder politicians who are in charge and screwing up things aren't doing so because they're older, but because they have bad political agendas and intentions. And yet, people voted on them...
If you're still unsure about that, just look at the Brazilian example. Our current president is 77, but was the only one that had potential to confront the opposing, fascistoid party. He won (by a tiny percent), and is working heavily, against an opposing senate, trying to give us back the rights they tried to take out, and improve our economy, favoring the poorer ones. He's not perfect, no one is, but his age doesn't make him a bad ruler, and that's the point