"Twitter was definitely cyber attacked!" says guy whose rockets and cars explode on the regular

Twitter has DDoSed itself before
- Ah, the Fail Whale. Good times.

Wha....what? This headline isn't satire. It's just a recounting of recent events.
- The onion can no longer create crazy ass fake headlines. Reality is more satirical than they tried to be.
  
  They should start reporting completely normal stories, of a stable countrh/government where nothing crazy happens. I'd comfort read and daydream the shit out of that

The cyberattack is coming from inside the house!

Heads up: This image was posted by The Beaverton's social media team but does not appear to have a corresponding article on their website.

Not to defend musk, he's a complete shitbag, but the "rockets exploding" argument is stupid, it's always prototypes, or after the main mission is complete, which at worse makes them the same as every other rocket.
- careless testing is careless.
  I have no respect for anyone that just blasts a rocket off with no protection below it.
  Don't pretend he's innovating. He's fucking around because he has fuck you money, and doesn't give a shit about the damage he causes.
  
  That's when it became clear to me that he really likes to think he's the smartest guy in all the rooms. Plus having all the money, he can surround himself with sycophants that will keep inflating his already-oversized ego. He had zero reason not to protect that launchpad properly (oh wait--$$$$), it was like a preview to his reckless DOGE forays.
  That was a colossal fuck-up that he has apparently swept under the rug (or just piled enough shit on top of it to get people to forget it in favor of more shocking news). He's not as smart as he likes to think he is, and that destroyed launchpad was a very good example of what kind of damage that sort of thinking can lead to.
- So they were supposed to explode?
  
  Actual Space Systems Engineer here (and not for SpaceX): Yes. One of the more recent ones had a communications failure, and self-destructed to make sure it had very little chance at causing the damage the above people have their arses in a knot over. It's rapid prototyping. Why?
  NASA projects run overbudget and over deadline because they're trying to get it perfect in the first few launches. That's only part of the problem, but it's a significant part. Look at Artemis: 1) launch, 2) launch to the moon, 3) launch to the moon for a long duration stay with humans. That takes so much time and money and simulation and testing of everything that even a government has trouble. So what do they do? They adapt, extend deadlines, increase funding, etc.
  Private industries don't have that luxury. If SpaceX decided to run Starship 500x overbudget to get it right in the first few attempts, they'd be bankrupt. How do you remedy this?
  Give it your best guess, strap a bunch of sensors to it, watch it (probably) explode (which really is any failure, as it's required to explode for safety if it can't land), use that data to improve the design, and then try again a few hundred times until it doesn't explode anymore.
  And in the end, it's cheaper than spending years predicting every mode of failure and preventing them like NASA does. It's a different mode of operation, because industry and government have different resources and norms down to the way the project is structured from a leadership point-of-view.
  And that's why commercial rockets are supposed to explode.
  (All this said, Fuck Muskrat)
- https://www.npr.org/2025/01/17/nx-s1-5266013/elon-musk-rocket-exploded
  
  Yes, it had bad consequences, but it's as I said, a highly experimental prototype, it exploding was certainly undesired, but also certainly not unexpected.