current list of formats from yesterdays post
current list of formats from yesterdays post
if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?
e.g. flac for lossless audio because...
(yes you can add new categories)
summary:
- photos .jxl
- open domain image data .exr
- videos .av1
- lossless audio .flac
- lossy audio .opus
- subtitles srt/ass
- fonts .otf
- container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
- plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
- documents .odt
- archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
- configuration files toml
- typesetting typst
- interchange format .ora
- models .gltf / .glb
- daw session files .dawproject
- otdr measurement results .xml
My god please no more yaml
27 0 ReplyFor videos, I bet it was .mkv they mentioned. mkv can have different codecs and different tracks, including audio and subtitles. I see it used often for tv and movies. I’m not sure if there’s disadvantages to it for general videos, like ones shot right from a camera.
I’ve been happy with .7z or .tar.* for file archiving and compression, but I don’t know the pros or cons of each. I think there’s room for different methods of compression though, so a standard format should be able to use multiple.
For font families, .otf seems good for realtime text rendering. Seems any newer standards are mostly targeted at graphic design.
15 0 ReplyAfaik the disadvantage to mkv is that it supports everything. That makes fully supporting and testing every case rather difficult and it's why webm, a subset of mkv, was created.
3 0 Reply.mka is a real file format, it's the Matroska audio container. Not very common, but I see them occasionally.
3 0 ReplyMkv is listed as container How is av1 better than HEVC? (I don’t know av1, only avi for crap quality movie files)
Edit: about 30% better and open ( source: https://www.howtogeek.com/778804/what-is-the-av1-codec/ (just disable JavaScript / use a reader to break through the paywall))
1 0 Reply
videos .av1 (someone mentioned mka or something like that, cant recall but thet mentiomed it being a 'container')
Yes, you’ll never see an av1 file. Typically it’s in a webm container. mkv is common too.
People tend to like videos with audio and subtitles.
15 0 ReplyYeah hi can someone explain the logic involved in advocating for Free Lossless Audio Codec as a method for storing photos?
14 0 ReplySo you can hear the photos real good
22 0 ReplyFLAC causes synesthesia.
9 1 Replylist amended LMFAO
3 0 Reply
I prefer .mkv for videos because I'm a degenerate weeb and .mkv can have subtitles baked into them.
9 0 ReplyMkv not so much a video format as it is a container format, so maybe it could be separated like this:
Video format: av1
Audio format: opus/flac
Subtitle format: srt/ass
Thumbnail format: jxl
Container format: mkvAs far as I know mkv supports all the formats outlined in this list and multiple streams of it.
Edit: I was wrong about the thumbnail format, it only supports jpg and png
18 0 ReplyDid you know that av1 is my favourite video format? Me neither!
6 1 Reply
You can keep AV1 codec video inside .MKV container!
16 0 ReplyYeah, that's my point
1 0 Reply
Documents: markdown.
config files: json/hjson
9 2 Replyif you disagree dont feel afraid to comment, please do
6 0 ReplyDamn I read this as
" If you disagree, don't comment"
2 1 Replymwahahahahaha
1 0 Reply
Why odt over HTML?
4 0 Replymarkdown (md) or org for notes/things that don't require much formatting.
I'm not in a place to make points for which one's better.
4 0 ReplyAsciiDoc for plain text markup. It handles more use cases, and has fewer ambiguities in the standard than Markdown.
1 0 ReplyNo MP3 for lossy audio? :(
2 1 ReplyMP3 is old embrace opus, high quality audio in small size!
11 0 ReplyThe only reason for it is compatibility with specific software. It’s otherwise just worse.
8 0 Reply