Cherry picking level over 9000
Cherry picking level over 9000
Cherry picking level over 9000
"Please, 2000 y/o Middle Eastern Jewish Communist in the sky who was executed for being a threat to the elites, help us recreate these contitions so we can feel closer to you."
Recreate? I am not sure if "worsen" wouldn't be more accurate.
I always wanted to try that bread as a kid. I would even get our giant bread knife out and try with a slice of bunny bread but it would always just tear and squish. I even put it in the toaster slot (a catastrophizers wet dream because they have to always be plugged in near water unless specified not) then slowly let it come up while I furiously sawed.
This is false advertisement
Watching those japanese kanna competitions brought back old cravings
edit: I wonder why toilet paper doesn't do the same thing?
I had to go find this for you, hope that helped a little.
I want to see the one that gets yeeted out of a window.
I think they just hold up the stale unused loaf, even place it on display .... never touch, taste or eat it ... and tell themselves and everyone else how delicious it is.
Everyone knows you’ve gotta eat Jesus if you want his powers.
I agree with the message, but I just can't watch that clip of Mickey, Donald, and Goofy being so destitute and downtrodden without getting intensely sad. To whomever hasn't seen the original animation this is from, prepare to feel worse than the opening of "Up" when you finally look this up.
I might regret, but, source?
The Disney version of The Three Musketeers, iirc.
It's from the start of Mickey and the magic beanstalk. The voiceover really ups the misery by talking about how they're destitute and their spirits are broken, and Donald and Goofy both go delirious from the hunger at one point.
Of course, after that tear jerker the typical Disney magic sets in again and the whole thing is largely played for laughs, but those first few minutes are intensely sad IMHO.
“Heirs of the Perisphere” by Howard Waldrop.
Three androids based on Mickey, Goofy, and Donald try to rebuild civilization after WW3.
Real tearjerker.
Never heard of that one, and I am sure it's not the animation in question, but it's an interesting suggestion nonetheless. I'll check it out.
John 13:34-35 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”
When was the last time you encountered a Christian who was a disciple of Christ? The only ones I know don't call themselves Christian anymore.
Last Sunday
I worked in churches for over 15 years, and during that time, I met many kind, well-intentioned people. But what I often ran into—and what eventually wore me down—was the disconnect between the teachings of Jesus and the behavior of many who claimed to follow Him.
The command to “love one another” wasn’t just a suggestion. It was supposed to be the defining mark of discipleship. But instead, I saw love regularly take a backseat to doctrine, tribal loyalty, and personal comfort. When challenged, many defaulted to talking points instead of compassion. They could quote scripture fluently but seemed unable—or unwilling—to embody it, especially when it required real humility or sacrifice.
What was most painful was the hypocrisy: preaching grace but practicing judgment, offering community but withholding inclusion, speaking of Jesus while acting more like the Pharisees He opposed. And often, faith became a shield—not to protect the vulnerable, but to protect egos from the hard work of self-examination. It blinded people to their own contradictions. They believed they were living rightly, when in truth they were often just defending their culture, not their Christ.
So yes, I hope your experience is different. Truly. Because for many of us who once lived and breathed church life, the gap between Jesus and those who speak in His name grew too wide to ignore. That’s why I and some of the most authentic followers of Christ I’ve known don’t call themselves Christians anymore. Our Christian values won't allow it.
Here is an excellent 18-minute-long Christian sermon by James Talarico I stumbled across earlier today which condemns Christian nationalism as being fundamentally opposed to the teachings of Christ. Based on the video comments, it has inspired many people regardless of their religious affiliation or lack thereof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Blph_2RSBno
This reminds me of the words of Frederick Douglass.
…between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference—so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity. I look upon it as the climax of all misnomers, the boldest of all frauds, and the grossest of all libels. Never was there a clearer case of "stealing the livery of the court of heaven to, serve the devil in." I am filled with unutterable loathing when I contemplate the religious pomp and show, together with the horrible inconsistencies, which every where surround me.
The entire thing is worth reading. The “corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land” is clearly the very same that overwhelmingly persists and thrives today… 180 years later.
A problem is that "christians" don't actually give a shit about jesus. They worship some heretic called paul.
Thanks, that message is truly powerful, by embracing love and keeping faith despite everything that's running against it. Let's hope that humanity will be more open to this message.
lol They've been cherry-picking since Constantine's Council of Nicaea. Half of Rome was still Pagan and half of it was converted Christian. Constantine felt that civil war was coming, so he invited all of the most influential from both sides and they sat down to decide what should stay in the Bible and what should be removed to make both sides happy.
That's not quite right. Council of Nicaea didn't choose biblical canon. They chose the teachings of certain Christian sects over others, which later had an affect on canon.
They cut out jesus entirely and worship paul.
Reads the part where Jesus flips the tables on the money lenders.
"No ... no ... not that part, we love money and need to elect all the greedy billionaires."
Reads the part about a certain golden calf.
"OH! Good idea, let's make a gold statue of Trump. Also a weird fucking golden goat with money glued onto it. Totally not cultists. Totally Christian."
You can just say “Christians.” The actual Christians it doesn’t apply to won’t care/know it’s true. Source: I know 2 actual Christians.
If you saved yourself you would save us all.
Same could be made about Christians finding arguments for why God is a good source of moral values.
I just like how overtly humanist and socialist Jesus’ teachings are. “Rich people are evil. Be good to others and share everything you have with those in need. If you don’t, my daddy takes that personally and will burn you like the trash you are at the end of time.”
It’s wholesome.
God is like that abusive father who’s throwing a fit whenever someone is having a mind of their own.
Why did you eat that fruit?!? You and all your descendants are going to be punished for all eternity!!!
Like, the only morally good thing God has said is to not kill, but he’s not really a good subscriber on that one himself.
They follow any of his teachings?
ITT People who think they understand Christian doctrine well enough to critique Christians
Jesus wasn't a communist. Sorry folks.
Read it again.
I don’t think you quite grasp what Christian dogma actually is, and you’re doing a stellar job of proving it by passing judgment. Funny thing: the people most qualified to critique a system are usually the ones not inside it. Remember when the church opposed the printing press because they were worried people might start reading the Bible for themselves and realize the clergy were editorializing? Turns out they were only half-wrong. Most folks still haven’t read it, and judging by takes like yours, they definitely don’t understand what Jesus actually taught.
Funny thing: the people most qualified to critique a system are usually the ones not inside it.
The only thing funny about that is that it's a baseless assertion.
Remember when the church opposed the printing press because they were worried people might start reading the Bible for themselves and realize the clergy were editorializing
The early church produced the canon of scripture we now know as the Bible. (E.g. It is literally the editor) What the Church was worried about is people getting Bibles and thinking they can figure it all out without the tradition of the Church. 40,000 Protestant denominations later it's pretty clear their fears were well founded. This is why Joe Jimbob's McChurch USA is playing with snakes instead of attending liturgy, participating in the sacraments and living the liturgical life of the church. It's why ahistorical low-church Protestants are proto-atheists.
what Jesus actually taught
It will be very interesting to hear your opinion on what Jesus taught considering you're entirely reliant on a canon of scripture assembled by a church you do not trust.