They are sending Gaza back a hundred years,” and argued that the international community is “complicit” in the “extermination” being carried out by Israel
So very true. We’re reacting to the present destruction of Gaza and asking for a ceasefire.
What does the future look like in Gaza? Any financial commitments to rebuild? Even when the bombings finally stop, how does Gaza survive?
good question, and there are no solutions yet. one thing for sure is israel will not accept hamas existance anymore, nor should anyone with a working moral compass.
seen as how it's abundantly clear that the Israeli govt is also an incredibly terroristic institution, no one with a moral compass should accept their existence either, right?
Alareer, a literature professor with the Islamic University of Gaza, warned us a month ago about how Israel is using “hunger as a weapon of war.” The Gaza Strip is facing major hunger issues as it enters the third month of the war instigated by the October 7 Hamas attack that killed 1,200 people in Israel. “The people of Gaza are dying of hunger,” said Alareer. “We have very little food or water due to Israel’s blockade. This is a systematic extermination – the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza. It’s a continuation of the Israeli ethnic cleansing that started over 75 years ago,” referring to the creation of the Israeli state in 1948.
A systematic extermination and an ethnic cleansing supported and facilitated by the USA.
War is funny.
WWI started because everyone had to respect their treaties and join their allies into war.
Then WWII started because countries didn't join together from the start.
So, even if we learn from our past mistakes and avoid making them, with war, we can only do worse the next time.
That's right. For a variety of reasons the adoption of sedentary agriculture was a kind of trap that pulled almost the entire human race along with it. Now, the few remaining people living the kind of lives we evolved to live exist only in the world's most remote and inaccessible corners.
I saw the article mentioned he had defended the Oct 7 attack so after some googling:
Soon after the 7 October Hamas attack – which killed about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, with about 240 kidnapped – Alareer caused outrage during a BBC interview by calling it “legitimate and moral” and “exactly like the Warsaw ghetto uprising”, the broadcaster said.
Yikes. Defending oct 7 was pretty fucked up move on his behalf but what Israel keeps doing is arguably worse. Both Hamas and Israel leadership need to be removed from this world....
What Israel is doing is worse, yet most world leaders are justifying Israel's actions. Nobody seems to be condemning these political slimeballs. It seems that Hamas, a violent liberation movement is being held to a higher standard than nation states.
It's pretty hypocritical to start a war and then, when the people you started the war with come for you, to claim that they're being too aggressive. It's not a morally coherent position. When you start a war, you know for a fact that there will be a counterattack and there is no universe in which said counter isn't going to involve lots of civilian casualties. Hamas knew this but did it anyway, so who's really to blame? Do we really expect the Israelis to just back off and not respond? Why don't we treat any other countries that way? Why the double standard? What's really going on here?
Violent liberation movement? Holy fucking fanboi apologists batman. You gotta be a sick fuck to be pro hamas.
They're terrorist monsters that can only be exterminated. Hamas who by hiding behind civilians, intentionally murder those civilians and celebrates the PR opportunity. All the while dumb fuckers fall for the propaganda and call these scum a "liberation movement".
I celebrate every time one of those animals is put to death. Hamas has murdered more Palestinian Arabs than any other entity, bar none.
Words don't justify a death sentence. This is the same bullshit reasoning that gets trotted out by bootlickers every time a cop murders a black person in the US. There's a mad scramble to find the worst thing the victim ever did and claim that makes their murder ok.
Oct 7 was retaliation against occupation. When you give people no other choice than violent resistance and mass slaughter them when they peacefully protest this is the result.
All the worst stuff that Hamas had supposedly done was a complete lie by the IDF. There was no rape or child beheadings. Targeted attacks with a low (3/4) civilian casualty rate compared to US and israeli avarages of 9/10 and 99/100, and taking of hostages.
You would be out here condemning Nelson Mandela and the ANC after they started their violent revolution against the Apartheid in South Africa. Cut the hypocrisy already.
October 7 was a military attack against Israel. It'd be a different story if he defended the rape and murder of civilians that happened during October 7th. As of right now we don't have any evidence that Hamas leadership ordered that, and the attack as a whole had clear military objectives.
I think many find it hard to believe Israel now. The Hamas side of the story is that Hamas were good to the hostages (and we have testimonies for that), and that many attacks were done by Gazan civilians who followed the fighters who broke down the fence, and indeed the video of Shani, the German Israeli, showed non-combatants parading her naked, not Hamas fighters.
Probably in a different narrative, Hamas performed a justified military operation to take hostages to free their own prisoners (whom we know are illegally detained by Israel without a charge and living through hell and torture in Israel prisons, at young ages). So far, it looks justied. Add to that all the evidence we have showing that many people on October 7th, especially those burned, were killed by IDF that was acting as though on steroids. I would be naive to assume no rape happened, but Israel's evidence for "systemic rape as a war tactic" is extremely flimsy. Israel killed its own people and is now milking their dead bodies for PR to justify a genocide.
That being said, no documented crimes can be denied. A Hamas fighter throwing a grenade into a safe room full for people - there is footage of that.
I mean yes in the sense that the capture of civilians has a clear military objective. Doesn't make it less awful.
One genocidal state doesn't justify another one. There are no good guys in this conflict. That said one side has more bombs than the other so we should be focusing on that side. But please, no justifying war crimes.
"At least he's not trump" is their only response and democrats worked hard to promote fascists like him to make sure that was the only response they'll ever need.