For anyone who doesn't get the significance, these crazy cats took out a modern main battle tank with an armored personnel carrier. That's like if the Bismark was sunk by the Titanic.
Yeah, that's the official name, but I'll stick to the APC designation. It carries troops. It's armored. It does not have a tank-level main gun. It's an armored personnel carrier. A good one, but an APC, none the less.
Wait they killed it with the gun? I saw the video but assumed they had used one of the rockets. I had no clue it was even possible to make a T-90 (or any MBT) explode like that from the gun alone.
@Wilshire Bradley destroying T-90M, Humvee being struck by a tank but with crew surviving, can we actually declare Russian tanks just done for already? All the US and allies need to do is to simply supply Ukraine with more of what was already sent, and combined with the F-16s they could start a new counteroffensive successfully.
Well, they have a lot of tanks, for once. What's more, there is no 'simply' when it comes to multinational procurements, or else Ukraine would already have received F-16s & friends.
But yeah, when you look at it from the outside, it's hard not to feel aghast at how seemingly close Ukraine could be to winning this, if only their partners did these few things.
Well, they have a lot of tanks, for once. What's more, there is no 'simply' when it comes to multinational procurements, or else Ukraine would already have received F-16s & friends.
But yeah, when you look at it from the outside, it's hard not to feel aghast at how seemingly close Ukraine could be to winning this, if only their partners did these few things.