Reeks of didn’t read the article because everything mentioned, such as a 1974 discrimination case, Central Park five(1989), and his dad’s casino chip purchase (1991) predated Bill de Blasio’s term (2014-2021)
It’s the internet. A truly gobsmacking number of people can’t.
We’re riding around in a machine that runs on outrage, and we’re as susceptible to conditioning as any creature. It’s unsurprising to me, particularly as I empathise with the urge to keep being wary and upset.
What does the win achieve other than energising his supporters against the Demonrats, deep state, sinister Jewish cabal, trans kids, or whatever enemy they've confected this month? Everyone else knows he's a crook - this is a net loss in the absence of actual consequences.
I don't want to get overexcited and pop my champagne at the latest possibility of getting a glimpse of boob meaningful consequences - I've spent enough time being wet, sticky, disappointed and full of shame, thanks.
People have died because of this shitstain. It's good that there's progress but you can't blame people for wanting solid evidence that this fucknugget has taken a hit.
He's still probably going to be president again in 18 months. None of this stuff is hurting his polling, and more and more people are evangelizing being never-Bideners, especially in places like this.
It's not a win yet. And there never will be a win. The enemies of democracy only need to succeed once.
I'm convinced by the opinion that Putin will funnel money for this through Trump's golden sneaker sell scheme. According to this theory, Trump's not gonna pay with his money.
I wonder if this dark money would give him some consequence on its own. Maybe more kompromats in the US, I don't know...