Quelle mouche a piqué le président au moment d'envisager l'envoi de troupes en Ukraine ? Plusieurs rapports confidentiels défense expliquent « l’affolement » de l’Élysée, où les chefs de partis sont invités ce jeudi 7 mars à évoquer la question. Sur le front, les Russes sont en position de force. Fa...
TLDR
Western planners underestimated Russian strength and assumed their defense lines would collapse upon breach.
Ukrainian brigade training was insufficient, too administrative, and short.
Western equipment is considered less efficient than Soviet due to maintenance issues and degraded mode capabilities.
The report emphasizes Russian superiority in defensive tactics with heavy machinery for fortification.
The Russian army is recognized as the technical reference for defensive strategies.
Western press reported Moscow's lack of interest in soldiers' lives, but confidential reports suggest otherwise.
Russians practice "Maskirovka," appearing weak to hide their true strength.
A stampede occurred during the loss of Avdiivka on February 17.
Macron presented other reports to political opponents, challenging Western press's underestimation of Russian capabilities.
Ukrainian general staff lacks a critical mass of ground forces capable of breaking through Russian defensive lines.
The most serious error is seeking exclusively military solutions to end hostilities.
A French officer concludes that Ukraine cannot win the war militarily due to insufficient forces.
Ukrainian soldiers' fighting spirit is affected by ongoing conflict.
Zelensky needs 35,000 men per month but isn't recruiting half of them while Putin draws from a pool of 30,000 volunteers each month.
The Ukrainian failure at Avdiivka demonstrates that Kiev is not capable of re-establishing the collapsing front with an "elite" brigade's dispatch.
Marianne is a french far-right sovereignist newspaper. I'm not surprised it's spreading this kind of informations as its goal is definitely to weaken Macron's government. Plus a lot of its headlines are clickbaity bullshit serving a far-right agenda.
I'm not saying it's a direct propaganda newspaper, but their interests are inline with those of Russia. It's easy to get an officer to say this or that so I wouldn't trust anything written here as it's just opinions from some french officers.
I wouldnt qualify them as far right, imo theyre more opportunist than anything, they use whatever crisis of the moment to shit stir and sell more copies. Its a bizarro mix of a lot of different influences, they have good takes sometimes, other times youre better off just tossing the thing in a fire to keep warm
Western equipment is considered less efficient than Soviet due to maintenance issues and degraded mode capabilities.
"How often do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?"
Russians practice "Maskirovka," appearing weak to hide their true strength.
Fair enough. You could only know this if you studied an obscure conflict called "World War 2". Very esoteric knowledge.
The Ukrainian failure at Avdiivka demonstrates that Kiev is not capable of re-establishing the collapsing front with an "elite" brigade's dispatch.
Throwing an "elite" (read: more well equipped than usual) formation to stop an advance is what the Nazis resorted to doing after the war had decisively turned against them. Didn't work for them then, doesn't seem to work for Ukraine now. Almost as if it's a bad strategy only employed by losers.
Im not surprised marianne came out with this, but im also confused because their editorial line has been for the most part firmly pro ukraine ever since 2022? Very on brand for this opportunistic magazine
There has always been a non-military solution... Russia can go the fuck home and stop trying to invade other countries.
Putin doesn't have "volunteers", he has a pool of what he considers undesirable citizens that he can trick or force into serving his meat grinder. Not to mention a seen in other articles recently he's now resorting to essentially kidnapping citizens from other countries to fight his war for him. Funny, I would think if he had that many volunteers he wouldn't have to resort to these tactics.
I can't really comment on the rest as I can't read the article and have no reference on which these claims were made.
There has always been a non-military solution... Russia can go the fuck home and stop trying to invade other countries.
Wouldn't that just lead to the citizens of the Donbas Republics being forced to fight alone against Ukraine and its remaining far-right paramilitaries?
Donbas is part of Ukraine. "Russia going home" doesn't mean they just retreat to areas where they already removed a significant portion of the Ukrainian population and replaced them with Russian sympathizers. It means getting their asses out of every part of Ukraine that they've been infiltrating, including Crimea too.
Then again, Donbas backed by fascist Russia and Ukraine having neonazi groups fighting each other, anti-fascists can't support either. Mathematically considering, Russia's invasion succeeding would promote more fascism to spread. What would prevent them or others in the future?
The US should probably have considered not backing the fascist coup in 2014 then. Crimeans and ethnic Russians and eastern Ukrainians in Donbas wouldn't have been bombed by the coup gov and it wouldn't have gotten to this point.
Agreed. When I was growing up we were getting towards the end of the cold war and Republican's stance was "better dead than red". Now look at them, getting all cozy with a communist dictator who cares more about giving the illusion of strength over the welfare of his own people. This reflects the position of all the modern Republicans as well, who are nothing more than performance artists bent on destroying education, health care, and anything else that benefits the public, as long as their wealthiest contributors are happy. What ever happened to stepping in and helping those who couldn't help themselves?
Most likely, yes. I haven't been following this as closely but Israel certainly hasn't hidden the fact that they are willing to commit all-out genocide just to get some land.