AMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7
AMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7
GDDR6 may not have GDDR7's bandwidth, but that doesn't inherently mean RDNA 4 will be slow.
![AMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/ad92217a-b2dc-4dc3-be2c-ba058d07a8e1.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Ah I remember the old days when a ram generation lasted longer than two years.
24 1 ReplyYeah, the days of DDR3 and PCIe 3.0 seems like eternity.
10 0 ReplyWe'd be all hype when they managed to squeeze another hundred megahertz out of it.
3 0 ReplyI’m still on PCIe 3. But that’s mostly because changing motherboards is a pain in the ass.
2 0 Reply
GDDR6 debuted in 2018
2 0 Reply
Totally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram
19 0 ReplySame. Get me a card with an older chip that has 32/64 gigs of just-decent VRAM but they won't do it!
7 0 Reply128gb of gddr5! Lol
6 0 Reply
Who needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?
4 0 ReplyFor gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it's not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.
2 0 Reply
Whatever happened to HBM? I remember it being hyped as the next big thing in memory speeds (I think by AMD), but nobody seems to use it.
8 0 Replyiirc it's because it's a lot more expensive compared to normal gddr. It's still being used in the high end enterprise market.
11 0 ReplyAlso reliability, hbm2 cards seem to have a higher rate of dying
1 0 Reply