Aren't those the same thing?

You've got a point. This can be a sign of something sinister. It's not necessarily a bad a sign but the situation that the previous user pointed out happens frequently enough that it could be.

I really don't get why someone would do this other than to play out some sort of sick fantasy. No one good ever destroys public utilities.

I'm aware that's how they work but when the system "works" and the result is starving families then maybe it's time we rethink whether we should keep following this system, no?

I love that we need ironclad proof to decide whether or not it's okay for people to be able to afford sustenance or not. If there's no proof then, oh well! The poors will just have to make do.

I choose to believe the person that gave you 1 will bump into you again and say "now we're talking" before disappearing into a crowd.

He's making use of his depends.

It's really hard to take the "law" seriously when we constantly see rich people getting away with violating it.

Syndicalism is the only way.

Wouldn't it have been hilarious if that's what happened after the fact?

They take us for fools.

Right, right, they were like "you're not doing it right!"

I believe it was coined by the British left when the USSR quashed the Hungarian revolution by driving tanks through their streets. Anyone still in support of them is deemed a "tankie." Nowadays it was meant to criticize authoritarian communists.

This new generation is so lazy.

I'm pretty sure it's Cardi B that you're trying to reference.

Shouldn't it be over estimates?

This is villainous.

Mother of all Bombs.

Followers of the Apocalypse are humanity's last hope.

That sounds like a setup to a deez nuts joke.