You're right, of you have compete freedom, do that. If the place you want or need to go to is most comfortably reachable via rattlesnake road, bring boots.

In other words, if you don't think the wasm landscape is mature enough to build a web thing with it, you are stuck with JavaScript, but you don't have to rawdog it. I haven't run in a single weird thing like this in years of writing typescript with the help of its type system, ESLint and a formatter.

It's how dishwashers work: more cycles = more rinsing, then later rinse it all off.

You could do a quick pre-wash, then a long cycling of water, and lastly a rinse with clean water.

[citation needed]

A perfect copy of you is you for all intents and purposes, otherwise I fully agree with your description.

Just use a formatter. It'll show you that the second one is two statements:

1. {} (the empty block)
2. +[] coerce an empty array to a number: new Number(new Array())

Gotcha. Given how the post we're replying to is about Stonehenge, I guess I assumed that's what you're talking about

Just Stop Oil said the paint was made of cornstarch and would dissolve in the rain.

Merriman said experts cleaned the orange powder from the stones because they were concerned about how it might react to water.

Might.

So because it could in the future maybe possibly damage it in some unspecified amount, they cleaned it off to be super sure there will be no damage.

So what fucking damage that really happened in the real world are you talking about?

That's the last three words of the article. The author didn't miss the connection either.

I always wonder when people repeat something from the article or ask a question that's answered in the article: did you not read it or did you just want to start a discussion about this connection and are somehow constrained in the number of words you can write per day?

It already dwarfed every other statistic before 2020, but sure, the last little bit was covid

Idk, I think there's enough internet funnies that don't contain slurs

I see, that is strange!

Downvote OP for posting misogynist shit and not the person pointing out out (on request, no less)

IMHO fine:

• female doctor
• woman who is a doctor

IMHO weird:

• woman doctor
• a female who is a doctor

So it's not a reversal. Using “woman” like an adjective is still weird!

In addition to what the other reply to you said, I was talking specifically about “female” as a noun.

“females like xyz” and so on.

I've never read any internet comment using “female” as a noun for human women that wasn't problematic.

Yup, that's what makes it good

There's various textures tofu comes in

• coarse tofu is like a more spongy, less fatty feta. Not great, but it exists to be pressed, marinated, and fried, which can make it amazing
• silk tofu is very tender, texture is something between jello and pudding. Great as cubes in soup.
• you can but deep fried tofu, which is great

There's probably more

I haven't read anything this cursed in a while

Great path, your Rust (and e.g. Python) will benefit a lot in the medium term. Medium because if you're anytging like me, you'll overcorrect at first and try to do everything without variables lol

Btw