I made an argument and you went "nuh-uh!" Sorry I tried to have a conversation with you, I guess. Maybe reflect on what you expect from making online comments.
Why are you ignoring my questions? I don't remember anybody saying "Iraqis are probably too fat and complacent for guerilla tactics". "Students of history" won't disagree that there's a huge difference between the 1970s us army fighting guerilleros in Vietnam and the 21st century us army fighting a bunch of tacticool idiots on us soil.
Did you notice that your only argument is "nah, it wouldn't be different" without any substantiation?
Right, when was the last time that happened on us soil again?
Also, do you actually see Americans as some kind of guerilleros? With current obesity numbers, there's no hiding in improvised shelters for most. Let alone simple but crucial things like "running". Did you think of how the country isn't totally unknown to the military, negating one of the major advantages for defenders in past such situations?
By all means, do not agree with me. You can't convince me you actually believe us citizens have a fighting chance against the fucking us military, though. Absolutely delusional!
Citizens will not stop a coup attempt using guns. You're watching too many movies. Be realistic.
An armed teacher would be the first target.
I know you don't think that, but imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable. It all comes down to money, of course. "Can't have my brand associated with sex because some people hate sex and they might not give me their money! Better pretend like we can deny sex exists altogether." And then the same advertisers advertise beer using boobs.
Ok, so what's YouTube's and tiktok's thinking, then?
Can anybody explain what the thinking behind censoring the word "sex" is? I mean, who is it being censored for and what is the fear would happen if those people saw the uncensored word?
But it's free! You love free stuff! Have some free emails!
I feel like an annual reminder would be entirely sufficient, to be honest.
a-hole
Fuck birds
How do you decide when to censor yourself or not?
Imagine spending 327 mill just so some angry old guy can tweet for three months.
It's actually really smart that he'll do all these things "on day one". Leaves the rest of the term free for golfing.
Look at all these anti-Semites! Thousands of them!
What the hell, OP? Don't ommit what it taught the guy about B2B sales!
The real POV would be a closed bedroom door.
Bill Barr wasn't AG for another 2.5 years before trump let off Clinton.
Here's an article where Conway says trump won't prosecute Clinton from November 2016, few days after the election: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38069585.amp
Bill Barr entered office as trump's AG in February 2019: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr
I can write a manifesto that says "when I'm king I will make the sun rise in the morning and make it go down in the evening". That doesn't mean I'm responsible for that.
You successfully dragged me into an argument over something that was never my point and I will respectfully end it now.