Hamas was an elected government, in 2006. Elections haven't been held since. I hope your mention of "elected government" was to say "an elected government shouldn't behave like this" instead of how it struck me, which was "the electors of that government are more or less responsible for the government's behavior today".
So now I have to somehow teach or show you that 33% can be majority?
“The Nazi Party lost 35 seats in the November 1932 election, but remained the Reichstag's largest party, with 196 seats (33.1%). The Social Democrats (SPD) won 121 seats (20.4%) and the Communists (KPD) won 100 (16.9%).”
And that does nothing to disprove the fact that the Israeli government funded hamas. Pull your head out of Benjamin Netanyahu's asshole and actually look into it. The info is all over the place. All you have to do is actually open your eyes and look at it. Going there has absolutely nothing to do with who funded who, but be careful and don't break your arm while patting yourself on the back, bud.
This is why I'm not interested in a source battle with you. To someone uninterested in the truth, it just provides a bigger attack surface for ad hominems and muddying the waters.
You are talking about one incident at one hospital when there have been over 400 hospital bombings impacting every hospital in Gaza. I don't need to prove it to you. The whole world sees it, and Israel has fucked itself for decades.
If you're willing to kill an entire people (that is, genocide) then violence works. There are no native American raids into white settlements in the USA anymore.
Israel has the poor taste to want to use the same tactics that European empires used in the 16th to 20th centuries, but in the 20th and 21st centuries.
If you think the northern Irish terrorism wasn't religious I've got a bridge to sell you.
Yes it came to an end when a ceasefire es agreed, exactly as I said. By getting around a table.
brits actually did
You say that like Israel didn't.
As someone else pointed out, the kind of genocidal force that Israel is applying may actually work, in the same way it worked for the USA with their "Indian Question". Though that ultimately was a prolonged military and economic attack from multiple fronts.
The question is are we still in a world that'll sit by one nation systematically eradicates an entire people?
China is around doing this, Russia does the terrorists you support want to.
True. The only difference I guess is west isn't on such friendly terms with those countries. Whereas we're actively aiding and a betting Israel's genocide.
don't randomly target civilians...
This is just a lie.
living peacefully together with the other people in Israel.
There's also Israel occupying Palestinian land and actively turning a blind eye to their "settlers" committing violence and murdering Palestinians.
At political terrorism, wich is exactly what i said.
Doesn't make it right to target a festival with absolutely peaceful people
I agree. However, Israel's response has been to use it as an excuse to carry out some good old fashioned ethnic cleansing.
They've killed or injured over 100,000 people.
They've destroyed or damaged almost all of the schools.
They've cut off water and aid.
They've destroyed or damaged nearly half the hospitals.
I'm beginning to agree that force is the only way to stop Israeli terrorism. The notion that Israel hasn't "done anything" to the Palestinians to bring on October 7 is ridiculous.
The IDF sets up humanitarian corridors as a PR move, then spoils it by bombing them. Humanitarian corridors are not exclusive to the IDF, as with every other example you started with "no other army". You also are completely failing to distinguish between Hamas and Palestinians.