Atari 2600 games couldn't run at anything other than 60fps since the system didn't have any way to retain frames so they could be displayed multiple times. The program had to be constantly outputting graphics data to keep up with the TV's refresh rate.
You are thinking about “cinematic“. And i would argue that being forced for movies is not because it’s better, but because it’s extended use in films gives the low fps an expected quality for movie watchers. The hobbit suffered from success over this.
Back in the day the fps for games was tied to the, i think it’s hrtz off the power lines, it alternates in 60hz in America. Slightly less in the UK.