"Rogue state" is such an interesting term. Saudi Arabia is not a rogue state, but Tuareg rebels are not a state at all. Iran is a rogue state, but Pakistan is not.
"Autocratic" is interesting too. Turkey before Turgut Özal had military as its supreme power, as that military had constitutional right to just disband any government they didn't like. So it was a legal junta rule allowing some democratic appearance.
In terms of being fascist and genocidal Turkey under Erdogan hasn't changed one bit to the worse. I'd argue it's possibly became better, not worse in that regard. Even despite their participation in Artsakh.
It has become more corrupt, maybe. But they had a period of terrific growth of both economy and population (which has abruptly slowed down), that tends to make corruption more visible.
"200 years" is funny too. I take it the Red Sultan or the Young Turks or Kemal himself were less "rogue" or less "autocratic" than Erdogan?
Typical Western ignorance, when they praise Kemal who is basically a Turkish version of Heidrich, only more successful. EDIT: for example
I'm so sick of this guy. Also what's with the assumption he's worth celebrating, there are plenty of crappy people out there, and this middle age Turkish man who likes sports shooting could indeed be one of them.
Winning an Olympic medal isn't a guarantee if having a winning personality or even being a good person. So can we just stop.
At least give the Gold medal winner a bit more credit.