“These big companies think they can enter small villages like ours, take our land, and destroy it.”
“These big companies think they can enter small villages like ours, take our land, and destroy it.”
Microsoft is building a data center in Mekaguda, a village in the southern Indian state of Telangana, which is expected to start operations by 2025. About 70% of the construction has been completed.
Last month, the state government intervened after Microsoft cited problems with the local village council.
A group of local residents has filed a petition against Microsoft, claiming encroachment and the dumping of industrial waste in a nearby body of water. The court hearing for the petition is pending.
E-waste in data centers encompasses a wide array of discarded IT equipment such as servers, power distribution units, and other electronic components that are no longer in use. Despite the rapid pace of technological upgrades, the alarming statistic from the UN forecasts that e-waste volumes could reach 74.7 metric tons globally by 2030.
They're it going to be dumping servers in the river. They'll get moved to whatever recycling infrastructure is nearest, or maybe resold on the second hand market. From what the article says, the local economy and farming industry has been in decline since long before Microsoft bought land for a data center. A picture of a stack of pipes, with no verification that they're even hooked up, aren't exactly proof of anything either.
It seems to me that this isn't about Microsoft or data centers, but about the local government versus the wider government. The locals don't want a data center but the government above their local representation doesn't care, and has the power to give out permits for this kind of stuff.
I'm sure there's illegal waste dumping by the construction companies as locals say (which heavy fines or even prison sentences should be handed to), but data centers aren't exactly chemical plants. There are many other downsides to data centers (such as fresh water consumption during hot summers, which India has plenty of, orthe impact on the local power grid) but as far as I can tell this is a political disagreement/power imbalance spun into an environmentalist story against a Big Bad Foreign Company to gain sympathy.
Not that I doubt the locals or anything - and like, fuck Microsoft - but what kind of industrial waste would a data center have?
From the article, it sounds like the facility is still under construction, so I imagine there might be construction waste, but that's not really my field and I don't know what that looks like. Runoff cement?
So construction waste is a subcategory of industrial waste. Typical industrial waste includes toxic materials like excess cement, fiberglass, bits of plastic from wires and cables. But once the data center is in place, most likely the waste will be e-waste in nature. Think heavy metals, copper, and yet more plastic. And the thing is... This is why they're putting this data center here. Disposing of this toxic waste will be cheaper because it's less regulated. The long term cost of high tech industries like this to neo-colonialized communities like this is the communities themselves. It doesn't matter to Microsoft they're making the water undrinkable. They don't have to live there.
And realize, too. Bill Gates' philanthropic missions aren't accidents. He may not run the show at Microsoft anymore but he still benefits greatly from their business. His philanthropic efforts aren't about making the lives of people who are exploited better. They're about maintaining that cheap form of labor just a little bit longer. And that may not be Bill Gates' actual intention, but the fact of the matter is he's a billionaire. He could make much larger changes in the world by not being a billionaire. He has power and influence to do things the rest of us can't, but instead of treating the illness he treats the symptoms. His actions sustain the system he benefits from
I don't think Microsoft owns a construction company. Surely the shady construction company is to blame in that case? It's not like Microsoft told them 4k dump their construction waste.
Also, Bill Gates isn't head of Microsoft anymore, and hasn't been for years now, maybe even decades at this point. The obsession with Gates doesn't make much sense when there have been way worse people who have replaced him over the years.
Maybe the construction requires the clearing out of old buildings/material and they are not properly disposing of the old materials? I can totally see a shitty contractor doing this. Still Microsoft's responsibility.