Phoenix breaks heat record as city hits 110F for the 54th consecutive day
Phoenix breaks heat record as city hits 110F for the 54th consecutive day
Saturday’s temperature had triggered an excessive heat warning across Arizona as lows were expected to range between 80F and 86F
Saturday’s temperature had triggered an excessive heat warning across Arizona as lows were expected to range between 80F and 86F
On Saturday afternoon, the National Weather Service announced that the temperature at Phoenix Sky Harbor international airport reached 110F, making it the 54th day this year with temperatures of at least 110F.
Saturday’s temperature breaks the previous record of 53 days that was set in 2020. From 1991 to 2020, the average consecutive days of 110F or above is 21 days, the NWS said.
An excessive heat warning has been issued for south central and south-west Arizona until 8pm on Sunday as weekend highs are expected to range between 108F and 114F. Meanwhile, lows are expected to range between 80F to 86F.
You're viewing a single thread.
110F = 43.33C if anyone else was wondering.
Jesus fuck that's brutal even for a desert.
good on you for the metric
Good bot, that's hot
Metric: 1 calorie heats 1 gram of water 1 C°, 1 gram is equal to 1cm³. Water boils at 100 C° and freezes at zero.
Imperial: 1 calorie heats 1 something by ?? F equal to ???, and 0F and 100F are completely irrelevant to everyday life and tasks.
I get your point, but disagree with your thesis. Fahrenheit makes a lot of sense for human comfort ranges. 0 and 100 are some of the most extreme natural temperatures most people in F-using countries ever see. 0 means cold as fuck and 100 means hot as fuck. And there’s a single-digit useful precision to it as well. 72 and 73 are close, but noticeably different. Celsius requires decimals for that kind of difference. And 0 means “it’s kinda cold outside, I guess” and 100 means “you were dead a long time ago”, so it’s not nearly as useful in every day life with natural living temperatures.
So you're saying it's relevant for basically nothing but the weather. It's not a very good argument.
To be fair, that's all it's used for. No one uses Fahrenheit for science in the US.
Is also incredibly subjective. What's comfortable for one person might not be for another. I'm pretty sure an Inuit and a Ghanan have pretty different ideas of what's cold or hot. Same for Floridan and Minnesotan speaking of the US
0 and 100 are not comfortable for anyone.
I get your point "but because I was brought up with this system I'm going to make an argument as why it makes sense to me"
25 Celsius is a nice summer day
0 Celsius you better take a jacket and it's probably going to snow
43 Celsius damn hot
60-80 Celsius a very nice sauna
It's not that hard burgerman
burgerman
Hey, we didn't come up with the shit in the first place. The Imperial System is a British invention.
Once upon a time I was going trough some hardships, sometimes I couldn't afford a meal, I'm not proud to admit that one time I took paper towels, wet them in a bowl and eat them, and you know what? Still had more flavor than br**ish food.
If it requires this much explanation, it's not very sensible.
In Celsius 0 is freezing and 100 is boiling. It's so simple. "Comfortable" is anywhere from like 15-30 (my Canadian standards, very subjective I know) and we don't need decimals.
Here you go. Pretty simply, really.
"Fairly cold"? I've been in 0c a few times in my life and every time it was freezing!
Isn't 100f the temperature your blood is meant to be?
98.6°F is body temperature. The .6 is funny because it's only there because someone picked a nice round number in °C then converted it. There's a name for that in math but I can't remember what it is... something about more precise than accurate...
It's honestly really intuitive for weather if you grew up with it. We still use metric for science because it makes the most sense there, like you say.
But it's not that simple. 100 boiling is only true at sea level. At 530 (~1750 feet) it's 98c. At 1500m (~5000ft) it's down to 95c. At 3000m (10k feet) it's just under 90c. Ocean water freezes at -2c. Fully saturated salt water freezes at -21c.
Fahrenheit doesn't have this issue?
Fahrenheit and Celsius both have the exact same issues. Which is why there isn't much reason to switch.
Temperatures can be given more accurately in Fahrenheit with whole numbers
We don't live in water, so as far as ambient temperatures go it's pretty useless. Good for cooking, though.
That's an approximation. Celsius is no longer defined in terms of water boiling and freezing, and they are no longer exactly 0 and 100.
The modern definition of Celsius is based on absolute zero and the triple point of water. And those are also the basis for the modern definition of Fahrenheit.
Any usefulness of Fahrenheit is purely accidental, how is water freezing at 32F useful? I'll grant that the finer resolution can be seen as a positive, I don't see how Fahrenheit is better for human comfort, my personal optimal comfort zone is 22-24C°, and I have no need for decimals for that. 73F is pretty close to 23C, I don't see much difference regarding comfort in either.
The huge problem with Fahrenheit, is that it is impractical in many situations, it has basically no merit to justify its existence, and only a minority of countries continue to use it.
Of course Americans can do whatever they want, but they are looking stupider for each year they keep using "Freedom Units".
Of course Americans switch to metric for mostly anything scientific, for example NASA use Metric.
The SI unit of temperature is kelvin, not Celsius.
If people don't want to use kelvin, does that mean they are stupid?
True, but Kelvin is based on Celsius, only difference is that zero is moved from freezing water to absolute zero. Celsius however is more practical for everyday life.
Celsius is only practical if you measure the temperature of water more often than the temperature of air.
But most people never measure the temperature of water, and frequently measure the temperature of air. For them, Celsius offers no advantage.
Why? As I see it, it's quite practical for air too, epecially when considering humidity.
A scale that typically goes from -20 to 40 is less practical than a scale that typically goes from 0 to 100.
Humidity is irrelevant. Celsius is useful only when measuring the liquid phase of water.
The usefulness of gravity is also purely accidental
False equivalence. gravity is not man made.
0 means any water outside will most likely start freezing, 100 means any water outside will be boiling. Makes sense to me. What temp do things start freezing in F? 30? 40? Doesn't make sense at all. What temp does water boil? 160? I dunno, none of it is rational in any way.
0/32/64/96 are somewhat reasonable breakpoints in F, and make dividing the space between them in half repeatedly on a thermometer simple. Fahrenheit was literally made up by Big Thermometer for this exact reason.
Lol, big thermometer.
"Somewhat reasonable"
they are all arbitrary numbers. Originally C actually had water freeze at 0 and boil at -100
Salt water freezes at 0F. Normal water at 32 F. Normal water boils at 212 F. Human body at 100 F (which is wrong, but also has been changing.) Below 10 F snot in nose freezes. 20 F is time to switch to long pants.
Water freezes at an obvious 32°F at sea level and of course boils at 212°F. What's so confusing about that? /s
Water boils at 99.9839 Celsius, not 100. What so confusing about that?
Hi sepo, :)
I get your point
but how often does knowing how to convert water weight to volume come up? Same with the energy to heat water.
Weight to volume is extremely common when I cook, because often things are measured in volume, but I prefer to use the weight.
½ a liter water or milk or almost any fluid without extra dish-washing? Easy you just put it on the weight, select tara, and pour 500 grams. Voila you just saved both kitchen space and extra work. because 1g = 1ml with water and most fluids.
It's equally easy if the number given isn't in liter, ml or milliliter of course converts directly to grams, and dl or deciliter = 100 g. 1 liter of course being 1000 ml and in water 1000 g or 1 kg. It's consistent all the way through.
I guess if you are used to Freedom units, this may sound like science fiction, but this has been reality in many countries for a long time already.
One pint of water or milk without extra dish-washing? Easy you just put it on the scale and pour one pound.
OK Imperial is not something I'm used to use, but according to Wikipedia, a pint is 569.6 ml and a pound is 0.4535 kg.
So you'd be off by 116,1 g or a whopping 25%!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_units
That would ruin many great recipes.
The American pint is 473 mL.
The Imperial pint used to be that much too, hence the old saying "A pint is a pound the world around". Then the Imperial pint was increased by 25%, but Americans kept the old amount.
How should I know which you use, AFAIK freedom units are American.
You don't need to know anything about American units. But rest assured that those who do use them still haven't found a good reason to switch to French units.
That would make more dishes. If i need flour water and milk i just use the same cup. And i have scale to wash off.
Their phrasing isn't perfect, but I believe they're saying,
- Put the whole mixing bowl or pot or whatever you're preparing in,.
- Press the zero out button
- Add your 500g of ingredient
- If you have more things to add, press the zero button again and repeat.
No measuring cups needed at all.
ok that makes a little more sense. It still laves them with a scale to clean cup for me to clean.
The water/weight comes up all the time. Filling a 10L bucket, I know that is going to weigh 10kg. I know I can lift it and my kid can't.
The energy one, I'm not even sure is right. We don't use calories, we use kilojoules. A joule is used to lift 1kg 1m. It's not something I ever use. I use kilojoules for tracking food I ate today, that's about it.
Yeah i dont really use energy unless i want explain kwh to gallons of gasoline.
But fir water buckets i just see the bycket and have enough experience to know if i can
Lifting 1 kg by 1 m would take 9.8 joules.
I'm a fan of the metric system, but understand that Fahrenheit is pretty convenient for regular human temperatures. For one, the vast majority of climate temperatures that we experience in the US on a regular basis land between 0°F & 100°F except for deserts & recent climate change impacts. For another, Farenheit is a bit more precise as whole numbers since differences between degrees are smaller, so I can be more precise with my a/c thermostat.
Still, I would prefer that we change to metric across the board in the US because it is more congruent across dimensions and decimals are easier to manipulate than fractions for me. For the latter, if I had a recipe that required I calculate 1/3 cup plus 1/2 cup, I have to switch to 2/6 & 3/6, which equals 5/6, then I'm stuck estimating that anyway since most measuring cups aren't labeled to the 6th precision. It gets even more confusing when we have to consider teaspoons, tablespoons, & pints. Using liters would be so much more convenient for me. Another area where I get confused is when measurements for food are presented as ounces versus fluid ounces. I understand the difference, but it's still something I have to think extra about.
My one request in switching over to metric would be that weather and thermostat temperatures are presented at least to the .5°C precision level so that 75°F would be 24.0°C and 74°F would be 23.5°C. Yes, I'm this picky about my thermostat settings and can notice a difference between 75°F/24.0°C and 74°F/23.5°C.
Request granted! My European thermostat that is about 30 years old now, has a display accuracy of 0.5 degrees, so I'd expect more modern systems to be at least as accurate. I'm not going to speak of the actual accuracy, but the display at least is 0.5 🙂
Permanently Deleted
Use the right tool for the right job. Fahrenheit helps plan your day, with weather or pool temperatures or whatever. Celsius is for science and engineering. This argument sounds a little like driving a nail with a torque wrench.
I can ballpark C to F. But pressure is never going to happen. Like what's 30psi? 547000 Pa or something? Who the fuck knows. Or you could use bar, with a scale of 1 to 5, lol.
How is using F a better tool for pool temperaturs? I have never heard of a European having problems with that using Celsius.
In what scenario is Fahrenheit more intuitive to someone who grew up with neither of the two systems?
Knowing nothing?! I think Fahrenheit clearly wins as it's normalized against your own perception and experiences. If you ever have direct contact with 100C, it will be less pleasant than 100F.
But my point was that both systems have their uses and I just code switch between them depending on the task. But if you have to have only one, it should be Celsius. I won't disagree with that.
But if you have to have only one, it should be Celsius. I won't disagree with that.
Oh no... Kelvin is that.
Kelvin is clearly superior to Celsius for scientific purposes.
I'm always amused when those who urge Americans to switch to Celsius because it's "more scientific" are simultaneously unwilling to switch to kelvin because it's not worth the effort.
Fahrenheit is no better than Celsius to plan your day, but it's very useful to have just one scale to do both science and your day planning (and everything in between).
1 bar is as close as practical to1 atm there you go
If they tell me it's close to zero (C) then I know it's time to change from shorts to pants. If it's close to zero F and you're still in shorts then you're probably dead.
Thank you!
It's also getting towards the end of the summer there when it gets humid.
I’m curious to see what the rains are like during El Niño with this heat
Thanks I had to scroll way too far. Please upvote this guy
We need a bot for that.
Thank you and Erk!
No one was wondering
I was
