How often do you hop distros?
How often do you hop distros?
Just curious to see what people are up to. I've been using Nixos for a while. It's fabulous and I have absolutely no reason to switch, but part of me is itching to hop to Debian or maybe OpenSUSE. How about you?
I've never really understood distro-hopping. Unless you have a reason to switch, why to do it? Or, why to bother?
If you want to check it out, read/watch a review, or test it on a virtual machine. You don't really – IMO – have a reason to have it on bare metal.
.. and all of that was a really long way to say that I'm very satisfied with my distro.
Yes, if you've found your distro, I also don't see a point in switching, there's more important stuff than learning how to install and setup your distro everytime you hop. I only hopped, when I wanted to have a clean install because my previous was kinda broken (dirty state over time), and/or wanted to have more control, or try a different desktop-environment. I have now found a distro (NixOS) where I can have all of that at the same time (so no point in hopping anymore for me too).
Especially testing a distro for short period of time makes no sense, because most differences are long term differences. Because installing a new and fresh distro with KDE in example is not very different one from another. Maybe the installation itself differs, if it's Archlinux in example, but most other distros use those graphical, easy to to use installers. They use a different package manager, but in the end it does not matter what it uses; they do all the same job. Most packages are available on most systems.
I really think distro hopping makes no sense, if you just use it for a very short period of time to test it. It's waste of time.
I don't. I just use Debian, because it's the oldest, most popular, most (API) stable distro out there. I have zero needs to switch. I'm sick of OS' (i.e. Windows) that keep moving/switching/changing things around in massive ways, just for the sake of change. I know they do it to stay fresh in the market, but that's simply not it for me anymore.
it’s the oldest, most popular, most (API) stable distro out there I'd say that's Slackware.
Somewhere along the lines of 10-15 years?
Never... isn't that normal?
I run a variety of VMs, and the VMs can run any distro, I'm pretty agnostic about it.
As far as my user interface goes once I've got it tweaked and set up I don't want to ever change it. But I'm one of those crazy people who runs macOS as UI, and a fleet of VMs below it.
And at various companies I work for, I run Windows, with a fleet of VMs below that.
On my secure console I run Qubes with a fleet of VMs below that.
I did about once a year until 2018 when I settled on Arch.
But now I've got a server on NixOS and loving it, so I might be switching my laptop soon.
I use NixOs btw Its awesome. Having a stable system config with home-mangere for the user env is pretty nice to just play around with the security of always being able to switch back to a working generation (some exceptions may apply).
I was messing with the hardware config (which has a warning not to mess with it if you dont know what you are doing) and corrupted my drives.
I got my previous system back from a clean install in 30 minutes.
Yes, it certainly invites you to tinker and experiment with the system without having to fear a broken state. I got multiple forks for different applications (e.g. helix-editor with a few merged PRs), and configured the system in a detail not comparable to any previous distros I was on. Really like how I can e.g. carelessly switch between different desktop environments (without VM)...
I don't, I've been on arch since 2012 when I left xubuntu. This install has been in many different machines and started life on a HDD and is now on an nvme.
Whenever my sound card randomly stops working and I can't fix it. I switch to a different distro in hope that someone has this mess figured out by now.
I'm settled on Manjaro GNOME for now but before that it was maybe 1-2 months of swapping until i found one i liked
The same day I posted this I had issues and had to move to KDE Neon lmao. I return to Neon every now and then and ngl I think it'll be a while before I move all things considered
I test distros at work that I wouldn't test at home 😅 And every time I have to reinstall it because of some error, most notabe one was some BTRFS error. Sooo, every 2-3 years or so?
You should have a look at Ventoy.
I'm a non hopper guy. In 2008 wiped out Windows XP to switch fulltime to Ubuntu. Never hopped to any other distro until 13 years later in 2021 to Manjaro (based on Arch, but with changes and updates come in waves). Used it 1.5 years and was not happy and switched to EndeavourOS (closely based on Arch) and still use it, even after a new installation on a new machine. I thought about switching the distro, but it works so good and well and has what I need. NixOS was on my radar, but ultimately it would be too much of an experiment, change and needed time to learn. The uncertainty what to expect made me stay with what I know, as there was no reason for a change in my case.
The reason why I don't change too often the system is probably because I inform myself and know what to expect. Therefore the thing I chose is probably exactly what I want.
13 years on Ubuntu deserves some kind of prize! It was my gateway into Linux back in 2006 but they started to lose their way with the Gorilla release. I like the look of EOS tho.
I started with Backtrack on a laptop, and I currently have Kali on a preserved USB; with endeavor as a daily driver.
That being said, my current "real" daily drivers in Win10, mostly for gaming - Not because proton doesn't do a hell of a job, it certainly does, but it makes modding single player games more complicated. I will say that is absolutely my fault, I haven't spent enough time to figure it out. But after work, and the wife, and the animals, and the alcoholic BIL who shares the house... I just want to use Vortex to add some simple QOL mods to single player games and play it.
I troubleshoot IT issues all day at work, at the end of the day, I just need it to work. I've hardened and removed as much telemetry type bullshit as I could, but I'm sure some slips out. For my threat model, on this machine, I'm fine with it.
On the aforementioned labtop I boot into Kali for... well, that has a different threat model.
Its all self hosted vulnerable VMs for the specific reason of education, but some activities may fall into a grey area, so better safe than sorry.
Does vortex not work properly on Linux? That's... disappointing
This is the first time in 25 years of using Linux that I've changed distributions.Welcome to the club. Nixos is fabulous. There's a steep learning curve though, and I still don't really get flakes and home manager.
Oh, it's very simple. Home-manager is something not yet finalized, optional and unofficial. Flakes was added in Nix 2.4, but you don't have to use it all. You don't want to add unnecessary complications. You can do without home-manager and flakes on a single-user machine. This is just one of the system configuration options. I have tried deploying the system with flakes/home-manager, done it with docker and even with
nix-env. The performance gain is not noticeable.
I think it's healthy to give every distro a try to see how it feels, because your favorite distro might be something you haven't used yet. Personally I've already used all the distros a decent amount and I don't switch without a good reason.
I'm pretty happy on Arch atm. The only things I'd need to change would be the window manager (Sway) or maybe the file manager. I switched from Nemo to Ranger and it's been so good.
My current plan is to integrate dust (the file size viewer thing) with ranger so I can see how much storage files are using in the directory I'm viewing. I need to find out where I can edit Ranger's functionality to accommodate this. I might have to resort to cloning the repo.
I enjoy Arch's DIY approach. I can tailor my system to how I want and if I'm not happy with a certain part I can change it.
Arch is great. I used it for a few years back in the day, but it kept breaking stuff. I hear it's more stable now but I don't have time to be fixing things all the time.
I started using Linux about 6 years ago. First 3 years were a hopping-hell. The other 3 have been with Arch, Manjaro then made the jump to endeavourOS almost 1.5 years ago and haven't gone anywhere else, and not planning on it at all. Just realized that hopping was just useless. Now I can finally set it up and enjoy my system.
That's basically been my path - I started with Ubuntu in 2007, then Mint, then Fedora, then BLAG, Crunchbang, god knows how many others, and then finally, Arch. After being on arch for a few years, I switched to Antergos, and endeavorOS when Antergos was retired (rip in peace, I loved it).
I've been steady with Arch/Antergos/EndeavourOS for the better part of a decade and I have no inclination to hop any more.
Yeah, Arch and what comes from it are great. I never have to worry about flatpaks or snaps or any of that. Just have my snapshots set up and I'm good to go
Only when there is a real need . Debian runs on everything and it is a no nonsense distro so I've been happy with that for years... Started on Debian 6 and continued until now on laptops servers and SBCs. Before that it was Ubuntu and crunchbang for a few years and before that was fedora core that came on like 6 cds with KDE3.
At this point the only interesting thing for me are security changes. Games are largely sorted due to wine , proton and vulkan and all of the great work going on there.
I keep and eye on quebesOS , NixOS, silverblue ,subgraphOS and openBSD and alpine.
The dream OS would be hardened by default. Hardened Kernel with ACLs for everything defined by default. Like each app should be required to list all of the files it accessed and the type of access in a manifest, list permissions it needs and of URLs it accesses. Obviously there is a need for some wildcard stuff but it could be limited in scope. More of the kernel in rust would be nice with legacy systems removed to reduce the technical debt.
I know we have apparmor and selinux and pax/grsec (if you pay) but I think they dont scale well and require a massive investment in time to understand and debug.
I have hopped rather rarely. I think my journey started with Debian -> (all kinds of flavors of) Ubuntu -> Arch -> NixOS.
Maybe I missed a few (started with linux at probably ~2005). I've stayed on each of these for a few years, I think I switched between Ubuntu flavors a little bit more frequently. Stayed on Arch the longest for ~7 years. And I think I have basically settled now since 3 1/2 years on NixOS without plan to hop any further distros (unless there comes a distro comparable to NixOS that has less quirks and is generally nicer to use (e.g. tooling, strong, strict static typing etc.)).
NixOS is quite different than other distros (which IMO are all very similar) but does package-management+system-configuration basically how it should be done (in hindsight). It's a rather steep learning curve in the beginning, but it only gets better over time, since your system continuously improves, compared to different distros that accumulate dirty state over time and in one way or the other break after some time. This was often the reason why I hopped on a different distro, since I wanted a clean fresh install, which I get with something like Impermanence+tmpfs on root after each reboot.
I was going to try installing NixOs on a partition on a spare laptop, but it didn’t like the fact that the rest of the disk was btrfs. I didn’t have that much time to dedicate to figuring it out, but lack of btrfs support was disappointing.
lack of btrfs support was disappointing
NixOS supports Btrfs
AFAIK NixOS supports every filesystem, that other linux distros support, and often with easier/better configuration, e.g. I'm using ZFS, which seems to be easier to setup on NixOS than on most other distros.
I switched from NixOS mainly cause there is no saint way to use my dotfiles except to adapt homemanager or the like.
For now I use my own OS based on Fedora Silverblue
Interesting.
I have settled with NixOS+home-manager. It got quite a bit better over the last 3 1/2 years.
After learning and understanding all the quirks of NixOS, I've got a super nicely configured system, that just gets better over time, not comparable to a(ny) different distro I know of (they kinda degrade after time IME). I really like the way I can compose all my configuration via functions in modules and reuse relevant stuff on different servers and desktops I use (via flakes), always with the same up-to-date configuration.
Don't get me wrong I really like Nix. But like you said the learning curve is steep. And just learning the basics including flakes for instant setup is not enough. Because all your config files gotta be rewritten which is a lot of work and nix specific knowlege to aqquire. If you went through it I can totally see the benefit.
However for me personally it makes more sense to use tools that have wide adaption, such as OCI images and CI/CD to buid the image. My thought: Using Docker/Containerfiles is way more adapted by the industry so people already know how to use that. Nix on the otherhand has to not only fight against the default way UNIX systems are configured, but also do that with brand new tools.
I agree all distros are at some point breaking it's just the nature of any OS. That's why the nix paradigm or immutable OS paradigm is far superior and the future.
Started with Debian Woody and stuck with Sid up until systemd, them hopped to Gentoo and Slackware (and occasionally Devuan).
Hi, I don't because I use Windows