the_dunk_tank @hexbear.net bigboopballs [he/him] @hexbear.net 10 mo. ago

"umm actually it's not child slavery because he was free to quit any time" ~ reddit

old.reddit.com Are some people just freakishly strong?

Nah it was basically the only job in his town when he was a child. Likewise no, you can watch anything he's said about his time there most of the...

13 comments

hE wAs FrEe To qUiT tHe OnLy JoB iN hIs ToWn (and therefore go hungry) At aNy TiMe
- Liberals learn what coercion is challenge
  
  According to libs, it's only coercion if the state makes it illegal. Anything else is "the consequences of your decision and therefore your fault." I have been unironically told this by more than one.
Your missing the point. It was not slavery, just simple child labour

OK, it's fine then.
- A description you can't argue with -- that's still horrible! -- is the way to go here. "Child labor in a mine" is just that. No normal person will defend it.
  
  You lose people when you get six hypotbeticals deep into a philosophical question about the definition of slavery, as you see in that thread. It doesn't matter if you have a point if people write you off when you say it. Step Zero is getting people to consider what you have to say; rhetoric and communication strategies actually matter.
Cause it ain't slavery he wasn't another person's property, was he exploited under capitalism sure but there's a big difference between being a paid laborer and a literal slave

Is there really though? Can you honestly call wage labor a choice when the only alternative is starving to death on the streets?
- The wage labour is just renting a slave instead of buying.
- Permanently Deleted
  
  In severity, yes. Slavery is absolutely terrible and I don't mean to diminish the horrors of it. I'm just saying if we look at them through the lens of class analysis, chattel slaves and wage slaves are on the same scale. If a chattel slave refuses to participate in the system, the consequences are usually swift and brutal. But if someone relying on wage work to survive today decides to stop participating in the system, what are their consequences? Starvation, utilities cut off, homelessness. Not as immediate, but still awful, and very often fatal. We're all participating in a system designed to prop up some bourgeoisie overlords who don't give a fuck about us, and refusing to go along with their system means death. Only now you get killed by the system instead of by an angry white man so the news can pretend it's not real violence.
  
  Sorry for the rambling, I'm just really high right now and putting way too much thought into this.
If I didn't currently have a ban I'd ask this person whether they think a child can consent.
- And their response?:

You've viewed 13 comments.