“People” shouldn’t be put in quotes here. They weren’t some incomprehensible Lovecraftian entities, they were humans and people just like everyone. That’s what’s makes their evil all the more horrifying.
Not only that, but we can see with our very own eyes in real time how easily the masses can get whipped up into a frenzy of hate by dehumanizing entire populations.
I know that I’m nitpicking but I have the urge to mention that that photograph is missing hundreds of thousands of adherents to non‐German variants of fascism.
Yeah but Ukronazis have been whitewashed, get with the program.
Also Ukrainian Nazism is actually pretty cool, I mean they're not literally
nazisSSHitler. Sure their greatest hero massacred a ton of Jewish people, and there's black and white footage of even average Ukrainians participating in pogroms themselves, but there's nuance man, nuance. You gotta respect the nuance.
He personally shot them. Thankfully they were already lined up in rank and file so Stalin saved on bullets by aiming just right
Remake that bad Wanted movie keeping everything the same but replacing Angelina Jolie with Stalin
he killed them with their weather control!
Nazis are bad!
Obviously this means the holodomor either did not happen, happened to people that deserved it, or -insert gigantic, utterly massive block of text from authors who definitely had no personal motive to be apologists or revisionists, totally.-
Even liberal historians admit the so-called "holodomor" narrative is Nazi propaganda.
Really, who?
Some argue it was intentional, others argue it was effectively colossal mismanagement and incompetence, and most seem to think it was a degree of both of those.
What part of 'Millions starved to death after Stalin directed a massive restructuring of the agricultural system of Ukraine' narrative are liberal historians taking issue with?
