"How can it be bimodel if there's only two modes? checkmate librul."
Conservatives will either choose to argue using some overly pedantic technicality or a vague "common sense" oversimplification depending on whichever will paint their position more favorably.
Conservatives really believe we think there is some discreet integer number of genders 😂 When your ability to estimate your opponents is destroyed by your own low-effort "gotcha" clapbacks. Talk about getting high on your own supply.
Any way someone could make this post more educational?
I read it as a "flawed illustration". I'm sure there's things left out of the allegory but idk what would be dunkable, I'm guessing there's something I don't know.
I think this tweet explains the concept pretty intuitively.
To make it more explicit, you could record a GIF placing the two gradients: pure red (#FF0000) & pure green (#00FF00).
Tell them that red is "man", green is "woman", & blue is "attack helicopter" or "dog", then demonstrate the huge "number" of values between red & green by color-picking random spots on the canvas. Challenge them to find a spot on the canvas has even a smidgen of blue.
Explain the perception of a gender binary by saying most colors are approximately red or approximately green, yet there is still a spectrum of in-between values impossible to succinctly enumerate.
If they genuinely have further questions, it'll be a good opportunity to teach. If not, they're probably deliberately trying to misunderstand.