Google's monopoly in the ad industry lets them profit off allowing scam ads to flourish, with no consequences
Google's monopoly in the ad industry lets them profit off allowing scam ads to flourish, with no consequences
Mark Cuban and Shark Tank don’t appreciate Google letting scammers use their brand to hurt people. Google is spoon-feeding fake “Shark Tank approved” weight loss gummy candies to innocent people — and making money doing it. The search giant’s monopoly power in the ad industry apparently lets them...
Google is spoon-feeding fake “Shark Tank approved” weight loss gummy candies to innocent people — and making money doing it.
You're viewing a single thread.
uBlock on Firefox based browsers works everywhere btw.
uBlock Origin on Firefox.
Do not use uBlock. Not the same thing.
What is just uBlock anyway? Kagi only shows uBlock origin for me when I search for "uBlock"
So the creator of ublock found he had taken on more than he could handle and transferred ownership of ublock to someone else. That project stopped getting updated and was eventually acquired by Adblockplus which is a for profit company that lets advertisers pay to be whitelisted.
Ublock origin is from the original creator of ublock and was original intended as his personal version of the extension free of the responsibilities he agreed to with ublock.
I can't imagine the temptations and harassments he faces over this extension. There's no way he's having an easy life being the target of the big bad tech.
Sort of a non-solution for the wider problem isn’t it?
I actually think the "solution" is in this article right here.
I think people have been slowly waking up to internet advertising
- Not being as good as it used to be in bringing in new/repeat customers
- That generally the benefits and utility are failing because of the swamps of scam ads.
Ads are basically the only profitable part of Google, and it's ripe for a new search-model to undermine its now old-and-busted algorithms that are only surfacing AI-produced garbage and for a new ad-competitor that produces an ad-experience that people won't turn on adblockers for.
That was the original promise of AdBlock Plus, that they would make deals with advertisers who agreed to standards that made the ads non-intrusive and clear they were an ad.
I'm not against ads, I'm against an ad industry that thinks we owe them viewing their advertising. No, viewing advertising is a choice it's not a legal requirement for us to use the service, to click on ads and buy things.
If the ad industry could shape up, I wouldn't need uBlock Origin or a Pi-Hole.
There's an opportunity, someone just have to have the capital and take the chance.
I'd probably still use PiHole but maybe ditch UBO.
Sort of a non-solution for the wider problem isn’t it?
Honestly, I was wondering what people here are talking about. uBO is so effective that you don't notice either its presence or the ads it blocks. uBO might be a real effective solution for the problems you mention - until enough people use and start hurting Google's revenue. Even if it does, uBO is a necessary defense since Google ads are obnoxious and potentially harmful.
Ironically, there’s no easy way to block ads on a modern Apple device. You know, Google’s competition?
? Firefox plus ublock origin works fine on the Mac. Unless you mean ios only?
Probably iOS. I use AdGuard and sideload a YouTube tweak to dodge most of the ads on my browsing experience
Yeah, I should have clarified IOS. Their phones and tablets are locked down with jailbreaks few and far between.
It’s not super easy but a pihole, with a vpn to always have your device on your home network, isn’t that difficult or time consuming to set up, and will block shit network-wide. No ads in apps, browsers, smart tv firmware, etc. unless it’s hosted within the same domain the content is accessed through (like Amazon's trash).
I’ve used that setup for years and it’s wonderful.
Firefox focus on IOS blocks all Google ads in my experience. There are some it doesn’t get but they’re not through AdSense