Sunak refuses to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father over PMQs trans jibe
Sunak refuses to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father over PMQs trans jibe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc18/6dc18c0503199f70f0e7ed72ae27737bbe1f7f34" alt=""
PM says it is ‘sad and wrong’ to link his comment about transgender people to case of murdered teenager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/435da/435daf0be5d6bff7149ce17b0cd4699089708880" alt="Sunak refuses to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father over PMQs trans jibe"
Sunak refuses to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father over PMQs trans jibe
PM says it is ‘sad and wrong’ to link his comment about transgender people to case of murdered teenager
Not sure what Sunak was thinking, but I equally find Starmers faux-outrage to be a bit distasteful considering Labours own issues with TERFS.
At the same time...just apologise mate. Doubling down isn't the play here.
I don't think he was thinking - I think he had his scripted joke and was going to deliver it no matter what. I've noticed he has the tendency in interviews to just repeat his answers when and interviewer tries to dig into a topic, he's just not good at thinking on his feet.
He won’t be bullied by the powerful checks notes murdered teenager lobby
The parents of murdered children have had it too good for too long.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Rishi Sunak has refused to apologise to Brianna Ghey’s father and said it was “sad and wrong” to link his jibe about transgender people to the murdered teenager’s case.
Sunak has been urged to apologise after accusing the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, of having difficulty “defining a woman” at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.
“But to use that tragedy to detract from the very separate and clear point I was making about Keir Starmer’s proven track record of multiple U-turns on major policies, because he doesn’t have a plan, I think is both sad and wrong, and it demonstrates the worst of politics.”
The former minister Jackie Doyle-Price told Times Radio that while she was an advocate of balancing transgender rights with the protection of single-sex spaces, Sunak’s comment “trivialises something that’s very important” and was “frankly very ill-judged”.
Dehenna Davison, another former minister, said on X that it was “disappointing to hear jokes being made at the trans community’s expense”, adding: “Our words in the house resonate right across our society and we all need to remember that.”
Brianna’s mother had been in Westminster during PMQs with her local MP, Charlotte Nichols, as she campaigned for mindfulness lessons to be taught in schools after her daughter’s murder.
The original article contains 507 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Talk about confected outrage.
Sunak was merely making a point about Starmer's flip-flopping on policy and various issues (which is ironic given the government does that all the time too), it wasn't an anti-trans joke and you can only see it that way if you're desperate to see it that way.
He was taking the piss out of Keir saying 99% of women don't have penises, Rishi believes no women have penises because he doesn't believe trans women are women, it's got some layers to it but the comment was transphobic.
I somewhat agree with you, but read the fucking room when the parents of a murdered trans teenager where in the room (or were very shortly due to be, anyway) it might be a time to just not bring it up.
Especially when he was making a valid point about Starmer's flip flops on policy, of which are plenty of examples to choose from.