Skip Navigation
166 comments

  • Jill Stein is a Russian plant, and anyone promoting her is a traitor.

    • Be sure to write to Reuters newswire services to let them know your thoughts about that as well.

      • To let them know you can’t stop posting in a politics forum about a clear Russian plant less than 30 days before an important election when you should know better?

        Yeah, I’m sure they’ll get right on it.

        You do realise news sites will report on everything any public figure says, whether it’s relevant or not, but you choose to spread irrelevant shit here, right?

  • Right back on it, I see. Interesting how you once again choose to almost entirely post articles here about candidates you aren’t even voting for. Nothing happening for Rachel Fruit for the last three days of your absence? Can’t say that’s too surprising.

  • And man, I found this amusing:

    …Stein told Reuters after a rally attended by about 100 people in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn on Sunday

    Weekend rally in one of her supposed “strongholds” of support, and she only had 100 folks show up? There’s city council candidates there that get bigger turnout at events.

  • They're back and posting BS! Jill (a Russian asset) is still more evil than Kamala, so it really doesn't matter what she thinks. I can't wait until the election is over so that you stop posting about the candidate that will lose.

    • Emphasis on this point.

      Jill Stein has NO path to victory. She would require a 50%+1 majority in at least 270 EV worth of states. She doesn't even have 10% of the vote share in any state. Thus a vote for her is only marginally better than a vote for Trump, and about as effective as staying home on Election Day.

      This particular poster's shiny object, Rechele Fruit, has even LESS of a chance. This candidate would require 50%+1 in three states, plus a successful write-in campaign for 50%+1 in another nine states (has that EVER happened in a SINGLE state) to get 87 EVs, a far cry from the 270 she needs to be elected. A vote for her is a fart in the wind. She doesn't even make the polling.

      One of two people will take the Oath of Office in 2025. If you don't want Donald Trump and Project 2025 shoved up our privates, vote Harris. If you don't want Harris, for whatever reason, may you suffer the consequences of Project 2025 particularly harshly, though I doubt many of the shi...err, posters who post here bashing Harris and the Dems will have to suffer the consequences of their claimed votes.

    • Reuters news service wrote a political news article. I thought it was interesting. So I posted it. That's it. Nothing nefarious going on.

      And I'll do the same thing after the election when I see interesting political news articles. There is no conspiracy here.

      • Everyone here can already see right through you, as you can see by the comments. You continue to use the "I didn't write the article" excuse while almost exclusively posting content that will get Trump elected. It's not hard to see, you're pretty bad at it.

166 comments