Solumbran @ Solumbran @lemmy.world Posts 4Comments 436Joined 2 yr. ago
I talked about the leader of the party of this senator, then linked a page about him.
What is going on with people here?
I said that the senator is part of a party led by a piece of shit. How does that mean they are the same person?
Are you trolling (or actively refusing to read)?
Edouard Philippe (yes that's who I was talking about) has been opposed to IVF for gay couples.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89douard_Philippe
I didn't have to dig very deep.
I clearly wasn't talking about the speech, but the party and more specifically its leader.
France is the same as the US, just a few years behind.
This stupid senator is part of a party led by an anti-ecology, homophobic islamophobic dumbass, they just all want to do like Trump, just in their own time and version.
Opposing the US is just about taking advantage of the situation to say "look, I am reasonable, unlike them" and has nothing to do with what they think.
Tu es parti vers un réseau encore plus anti-connards, pour voir moins de posts à ce sujet ?
Pensée intéressante.
Think, talk, repeat until you reach a conclusion.
Ah yes, or the whole "using gender-neutral pronouns is a political move that shouldn't be allowed" debacle
"Americans" are not an ethnicity. Talking about the culture of a country is nothing similar to attaching innate characteristics to a person based on origin/skin color/etc.
Somehow people don't see it.
But I mean, some people like Enterprise , section 31 or Picard that contain the worst morals ever shown in a Star Trek show so people are not going to see the problem with the orville.
Woke veut dire "je suis un nazi ou sympathisant, ignore le reste de mes propos"
En même temps la France adore les pedos tellement fort qu'elle leur distribue des médailles pour les récompenser donc bon, rien d'étonnant.
I mean, I don't know why a show that was showing rape as positive, sexy and wanted by women even still exists so...
This does not require ethnicity at all.
If someone is discriminated because of an ethnicity they don't actually have (let's say a Mexican being targeted as an "arab") should they not get compensation ?
According to your logic, you need ethnicity to give compensation which means that you require victims to have a specific ethnicity to be recognised, but it is absurd. What makes victims victims is what they went through, not the reason they suffered abuse.
And this doesn't even apply to colonization as in this case most of the times the former colony is now a country, and as such you can give compensation to the country and its citizens, no ethnicity required.
Either way, ethnicity is not needed.
I think that being a colonizer is not something a government should be. So yes, definitely, such a treaty is bad.
A government should be treating people as equally as possible. Ethnicity only brings unnecessary division.
A creep writer and an absurdly obscure licence.
What could go wrong.
C'est pas comme si Macron était très loin du trumpisme.
S'il était né aux US il aurait été son bras droit.