Or 20% less child...

I don't know if this means the child is younger... Missing more limbs or older...

It's for store finding. While you and I might not use it a lot of people do.

Look. You need to stop moving the goalposts. The post I replied to was about "could a person be charismatic enough to gain 12 followers." The answer is yes.

Could a person do it in a short period of time? Yes.

Why do you insist on being insufferable?

Jim Jones started his church in 1954 and had enough followers to buy his own church building by 1955.

I don't know the exact timeline on it but his faith healing garbage was a conscious effort to engender faith in his teachings and has been written about as being effective in less than a year.

Not having to interact with Nazis is tied to which instance I signed up on? I'm confused by this argument.

I think this makes them a good human... Since like 99% of humans are bad at math it makes sense since they would make this mistake....

This happens regularly... They are called cults today... Their members also believe their Messiah is a messenger from (or literally is) god... And they get much more than 12.

I feel like people need an education about the difference between spirit of the law and letter of the law.

This comment reads like this:

"I posted some truly heinous shit and a mod/admin removed it but I didn't break any written rules therefore my right to force other people to be subjected to my desires was impinged upon😭😭😭😭."

A thousand novel mistakes.

The two cases, they knew what it was and they did it maliciously. They didn't know what they were doing and got socially engineered in the process. Both cases are cause for failure.

Sure. But for an entry level interview as a pen tester... Scanning with Kali should be an easy task.

Using Kali? Easy if you have training. The capstone for our security course a decade ago was too find and exploit 5 remote machines (4 on the same network, 1 was on a second network only one of the machines had access to) in an hour with Kali. I found all 5 but could only exploit 3 of them. If I didn't have to exploit any of them 7 would be reasonably easy to find.

Kali basically has a library of known exploits and you just run the scanner on a target.

This isn't novel exploit discovery. This is "which of these 10 windows machines hasn't been updated in 3 years?"

Ah. I see. So it's not that you can't get them it's that they are expensive and you are looking for a reasonably priced way to get one. That makes sense.

Online? I'm confused, do they not ship to Greece?

Lol. This isn't my argument. This is your argument followed more completely.

You don't even know what my argument is or what my beliefs are. All I have done is point out your own hypocrisy.

You know how I know you are lying? Because your first reaction to me expanding on your argument was to tell me I am a sinner.

If you treat any of your "friends" that way you are truly a terrible person.

You don't like being called a fundamentalist because you know they are abhorrent.

You don't like your own argument. You can't even stomach the inkling that your own hypocrisy.

Lol. This isn't my argument. This is your argument. You just don't understand it or the hypocrisy you live with on a daily basis.

You are right that it's fundamentally radical and can be seen as atrocious. Fundamentalist religious whack jobs like you made it up.

Even if we grant you your invalid position, you are still wrong. So close. You claim the unborn person has rights, but so did the mother.

In no legal jurisdiction in the United States is one person ever required to give up their bodily autonomy for another. This the mother, according to your argument, is under no legal obligation to provide the other person, according to your argument, the mothers body for any reason. If the mother wishes to discontinue the use of her body she can. If the other person dies as a result of this decision, the mother bears no responsibility.

This is well understood case law and common law.

GTFO with this terrible argument.

Separation of data between accounts makes them fall under different retrieval requirements.

As one account, a request for all of the data from that account contains both chunks. Separation of those accounts separates the need to accommodate requests for data from one on the other.

It can also mean that internally they may have a sufficient mechanism that data that was previously identifying to no longer being identifying (breaking userid to data pairings for example) which is sufficient to "anonymize" the data that it no longer needs to be reported or maintained.