I wonder if you're not thinking of the L.P.D.: Libertarian Police Department bit, because eg. the publicly funded sidewalk thing sounds very familiar:
I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.
Not anarchist though, but your description sounds like it'd match
Governments rarely realize anything related to IP that the copyright mafia doesn't spoon-feed them, unfortunately.
The inconsequential typo really wasn't what elicited my comment
Honestly then fact that anybody is attracted to men proves sexuality is not a choice
people still constantly bring him up, and even say his political views aren’t “that bad” on lichess during random broadcasts
Gee I wonder what kind of people would say that 🤔
Increase your dosage
Researchers have achieved data rates as high as 424Gbit/s across a 53-km turbulent free-space optical link using plasmonic modulators—devices that use special light waves called surface plasmon polaritons to control and change optical signals
This could be a line from Star Trek
I've gotten so cynical about the "sustainable" label that I pretty much assume any product, company, etc. that claims to be sustainable is probably the exact opposite.
They're "depressed and despondent" because they judge comic movie fans? This is some prime Dr. Phil level psychology right here.
Far as Swift's syntax goes, I really like argument labels too, but it's just that there's SO. MUCH. SYNTAX. Lots of sugar, yes, but sometimes that's part of the problem in my opinion, because it often adds to the syntactic and semantic "noise." Also, there's 98 keywords (more if you count eg. try
, try!
and try?
as different keywords, and this count is missing eg. sending
and other new keywords) – compare this to say Rust's or or Python's 35. Java's got 68, while C++ also has 98 and it's notorious for having way too many of them. And then there's all the symbols – some of which have different meanings in different contexts.
It's true that ARC only applies to reference types, but even with value types you can often get some fairly surprising performance problems due to implicit copies, for example in getters and setters – and the _read
and _modify
accessors that can sometimes help with that due to returning (well, yield
ing) a borrowed value instead of a copy aren't meant for "public" use (which doesn't mean many libraries etc. don't use them, much to the consternation of core devs).
Urr, I don't think that's it. I'm not sure stereo sound for vinyls has ever worked so that something like this would be necessary, and it wouldn't really make sense – why would they have to put vocals on one channel and instruments on the other?
A stereo vinyl player just has the needle moving up and down in addition to left and right, so that the left-right axis is the sum of the waveforms of both channels and the up-down axis is the difference – which means that a regular mono player can play stereo vinyls
Would have cost you exactly 0 € to not be a cunt, but here you are.
I didn't correct it because I was away from my computer for an extended period – the current version has a different image and is correctly attributed. I didn't delete it because then the existing conversation in the comments would have also gotten nuked, exactly the same reason the mod didn't delete it either.
Yeah I doubt those particular comments have anything to do with "AI". It just seems fashionable to blame AI for absolutely everything nowadays
I'll just make a new one (this isn't oc) when I get home but that'll be 10h at least. It's OK to nuke this since it is sorta misinfo, although I didn't know it when I posted it
capiTALiSm bREeDS INnOvATIon
So if any Jews, gay people, communists, Roma, etc. during the Holocaust wished death on the Nazis, they were as bad as the Nazis?
Swift is… not a great language. It's got some promise but goddamn does it have a "designed by committee" feel to it; they just keep throwing on features like they're going out of fashion and it's getting ridiculously complex. Just the syntax alone is a bit of a nightmare – soooo many keywords and symbols. It's also extremely hard to predict how well Swift code will perform, in large part due to ARC (automatic reference counting) memory management, which is a huge downside for game development. And don't even get me started on the new concurrency stuff…
Just as a side note, it's not purely an Apple project nowadays. They're still the "project lead" but it's not exclusively theirs anymore. Still, regardless of that, at least personally I really couldn't recommend it especially to someone looking to get into game development.
Edited to replace original incorrect Herzog attribution with my own version that correctly attributes the quote