"Assume a spherical cow"
71 0 Reply"In a frictionless vacuum"
48 0 ReplyA spherical cow of uniform density in a frictionless vacuum.
37 0 Reply33 0 Reply
I know how to solve this, but my solution only works for spherical cubes in a vacuum.
23 0 ReplyHuh, I thought cats were a liquid.
20 0 ReplyPut it in a box. Problem solved.
12 0 Reply
Anyone seen Space Truckers?
18 0 ReplyThe only thing I remember from that movie is the gas powered wang
3 0 ReplyOf papa Lannister, no less.
3 0 Reply
Is cube a simple shape in physics? It' 3-dimensional and It's gonna do all sort of crazy flips due to aerodynamics and moment of inertia. I would prefer a 1-dimensional point like cat.
18 1 ReplyHow would a point like cat be one dimensional? It would be zero dimensional. A one dimensional cat would be a line.
6 0 Replysorry. 0-dimensional cat moving in 2-dimensional space.
2 0 Reply
Weren't the cats 3 dimensional? Dude this water sure is messing my percepcion of reality, for a moment I really tought we were living in a capitalist dystopia, uff.
1 0 Reply
I prefer 'cubiform', but I never realized that cubicle could be an adjective.
7 0 ReplyNot spelled that way
1 0 Reply
There was a newspaper article about flying cats, where journalists assumed them flat and rectangular to simplify calculations
5 0 ReplyTIL that cubicle is an adjective and a noun. I was calling things "cube like" until now
6 1 ReplyCubicle is the noun (mini office); cubical is the adjective (having cube-like properties). :)
17 0 ReplyOh, the spelling difference got me. Thank you!
4 0 Reply
lmao true
2 0 ReplyIf they’re anything like my dad, they’ll just deny the findings as a liberal attack against conservative righteousness.
You can’t win with these assholes.
2 0 Reply