politics @lemmy.world blorbo @lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago

Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019

www.nbcnews.com Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019

Trump has attacked Walz as "very liberal" after he was selected as Harris' running mate, but the former president himself once put the Minnesota governor in a

53 comments

This is just getting hilarious now.
- I literally woke my partner up laughing. So he donated to Kamala and appointed Walz to a position. They have both been endorsed by him. This is so delicious
- Trump on Walz: “…He's very heavy into transgender. Anything transgender he thinks is great ... I think it's very insulting to Jewish people.”
  
  Did he actually say that? My God, the man's brains have been replaced with rancid oatmeal, and he never noticed the difference.
He'LL uNLEaSh HeLL oN eArTh!!- Syphilis Riddled Big Brain who forgot he appointed him to a position.
As president, Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019. The bipartisan advisory council consists of five Democratic and five Republican governors and helps build federal-state partnerships in matters of homeland security and civil support missions.
interests of governors across the nation are accurately represented on the council

Is this just bad wording? Shouldn’t it be the interests of the people whom the governors represent?
- No, it is accurate. The committee was about the interests of the governors in the context of differences between states, and while the governor's interests should align with the people they represent, they don't always line up.
  
  In my state it doesn't like up at all. "I see there's a lot of hunters and fishermen in this state. How about we sell more land to giant corporations and poison the waterways with farm runoff?" And half of them are like "anything to own the libs! Hyuck hyuck!"
  
  while the governors' interests should align with the people they represent, they don't.
  
  FTFY
🤣
This sub would be better with political topics and discussions and not with politicians ads.
- How is this conversation not a political discussion? What makes this an ‘ad’? I’m just curious for your point of view.
  
  Edit: (forgot ‘this’)
  
  Curious.
  
  Does a repost from mass media on red and blue electoral campaign sum up "political discussion" to you?
- Thank you for admitting you're a fascist so I know to block you.
  
  You shout like that, you're a fascist. Right away. No trial, no nothing. Journalists, we have a special fascism for journalists. You are stealing: fascist. You are playing music too loud: fascist, right away.
  
  Driving too fast: fascist. Slow: fascist. You are charging too high prices for sweaters, glasses: you fascist.
  
  You undercook fish? Believe it or not, fascist. You overcook chicken, also fascist. Undercook, overcook.
  
  You make an appointment with the dentist and you don't show up, believe it or not, fascist, right away.
  
  We have the best posters in the world because of fascist.
  
  Excuse me but how is suggesting that this sub would be better with political discussions instead of ads a fascist admission?
NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/live-blog/harris-trump-presidential-election-live-updates-rcna164954/rcrd51257?canonicalCard=true

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

You've viewed 53 comments.