What should I watch? is now a much easier question than How do I watch it?
Streaming Has Reached Its Sad, Predictable Fate | What should I watch? is now a much easier question than How do I watch it?::<em>What should I watch? </em>is now a much easier question than <em>How do I watch it?</em>
The decline of legal streaming, through the dividing up of content onto multiple expensive streaming platforms, has pushed me away from legal options onto the black/grey market where I can get much more content for much less on a more convenient single platform.
He noted piracy was an issue of service and ease of availability, not price. Case in point, itâs far easier for me to wait for a Steam sale and have a legal game than it is for me to go through all the effort of waiting for a decent crack, torrenting the game, and then waiting for the crack to the patch because of something that doesnât run well.
I used to pirate games to âsampleâ them, and now itâs simply easier to just buy through Steam. If I hate itâŠoh, well. It only cost $10 through a Steam, GOG, or Humble Bundle sale.
Video streaming used to be somewhat like this when everything was through Netflix. One place to get everything you wanted was far easier than trying to acquire things through piracy.
Now, however, youâve got to have 6 different streaming services to get what used to require only one, and with the price of hard drives going down every year, itâs actually easier to torrent what I want and just have things in my personal collection thatâs never going to just get removed suddenly because NBC Universal decides that they want a piece of the pie as well.
You can ask a refund for any Steam game after a few hours of play. Refund is full, no questions asked. I've done it multiple times with games that just didn't click for me.
From a business standpoint that might make sense. In my opinion though, what we now call "piracy" is really a superior model of universal access to information. As-is we're needlessly holding back humanity in the name of promoting profit for rights holders.
Provides a better service and doesn't just jack up the price. Steam sales are some of the best discounts around. Embraced Linux and worked to build upon its open foundations to deliver a great handheld which is open . Great customer service in general. Obviously there will always be people pissed off but going by sales and the general vibe I think it largely favors a positive position.
I think steam is a private company so there are no shareholders to crack the whip. They seem to be good to their staff too and give back to the Linux community.
He specifically stated that before, and also in general just focused on making steam accessible. Some people have issues with steam and what it has for annoying DRM, but compared to what EA and Ubisoft did with their platforms, Steam doesn't shine itself down your throat, doesn't bloat everything, and has a massive library.
I think this is true for most people on Lemmy. But I do wonder what the average streaming users will do. What about "free" streaming platforms like Channel 4 in the UK? Content is king, and the path of least resistance will always trump.
Two days after the Super Mario movie hit theaters I walked into my barber shop and it was playing in 4K on the TV. HDMI streaming sticks loaded with self updating piracy apps with a simple Netflix-like interface can be found easily by most consumers.
In my household, where we pirate very very rarely if ever (the last time Iâm aware of was 2010, though Iâm not the software engineer in the relationship), we plan to: a) cycle between apps as needed; and b) frankly, watch less tv. Weâre watching a couple of things on Netflix right now but once weâre done, thatâs the next to go, much to my kidsâ dismay. Theyâll get over it.
Pluto TV is massively popular with my older relatives. Free, plays the shows they like, and they don't care about the obnoxious ads. Luckily none of them have bought the fake gold coins, Trumpy Bears (don't even look it up), or Shitty My Pillows yet.