Both sides support genocide and rascism. The only difference is aestheics and cultural signifiers
Trump wants to build the wall and do genocide because be is racist.
Harris wants to build the wall and do genocide because it is good for the economy.
They are clearly not the same.
We are constantly making the mistake in Russia of judging the slogans and tactics of a certain party or group, of judging its general trend, by the intentions or motives that the group claims for itself. Such judgement is worthless. The road to hell—as was said long ago—is paved with good intentions.
It is not a matter of intentions, motives or words but of the objective situation, independent of them, that determines the fate and significance of slogans, of tactics or, in general, of the trend of a given party or group.
~ V.I Lenin Word And Deed
If both parties are doing the same shit, it doesn't fucking matter why
Unironically this.
On the left is racism AND genocide. But you knew that already, you're just happy to mislead.
Damn if she's not racist she should stop implementing racist policies and using racist rhetoric that endangers immigrants and minorities then. I'm sure it's all just a big misunderstanding.
Are you just going to ignore the racist and xenophobic talking points by Harris about how immigrants are bringing fentanyl to kill US citizens? Or Harris bringing up the factually incorrect claims about Hamas members and Palestinian men sexually assaulting Israelis, based on racist colonial tropes. Or how Harris was a top prosecutor that spent her entire career locking up minorities. I could go on and on, the entire debate consisted of the candidates trying to outdo each other with the amount of racism they were spewing.
in the right is racism and genocide, but in way that's palatable to libs, you’re just happy to mislead
The right is genocide AND rascism. But you knew that already, you're just happy to be self-decieved
Don't forget rape!
How could we when Kamala enthusiastically repeats complete fabrications about Oct. 7th as justification for the genocide she's currently supporting. She even said it again last night!
[https://thecradle.co/articles-id/26397](Inside Isreal's torture, rape and dehumanization centers)
Agreed, no rapist or rapist supporter can ever be trusted with power
Best line I've heard yet on the issue
How do you like your shit served?
Having a fringe lunatic as plausible opposition actually works really great in a two-party system, as the Democrats can really focus on policy for lobbyists and not so much on policy for the electorate. Just point out that the other guy would be worse.
It's even worse this time, Kamala is running to the right of Trump in 2016 regarding Immigrants, so you can see in real time Trump jump to go even further right, like the cats and dogs bit.
Which of these candidates do you think will be more willing to have their minds changed with protests and petitions?
Nothing is going to be easy or perfect, but we can at least choose the most likely candidate that is slightly more aligned with our desired outcome and then fight for what is needed.
Neither, specially after they are elected.
zero equals zero
Obviously neither, and anybody who claims otherwise is not engaging with reality.
Neither, American support for genocide has an economic basis and both candidates serve Capital.
sry, wrong sub, people here want trump to win xD
Need to add Jill Stein and Chase Oliver to the mix to fully embrace how weak all our candidates are.
My dad gave me a choice between a pair of skates or a 10 year old used car when I turned 18 but I refused both and told him I wanted a brand new car. I ended up with a pair of skates. Getting to work was hard the next 4 years.
/s
I'm 13 and this is deep.
So voting for genocide is as easy to shitlibs as it is to buy skates. Good to know.
