Uncommitted won’t endorse Harris but urges voters to “block Donald Trump”
Uncommitted won’t endorse Harris but urges voters to “block Donald Trump”
The group representing voters frustrated by the administration's policies on Gaza says Harris has made it “impossible” to endorse her.
We must block Donald Trump, which is why we urge Uncommitted voters to vote against him and avoid third-party candidates that could inadvertently boost his chances
Isn't this just saying vote for Harris?
That’s just endorsing Harris with extra steps.
I guess what they're trying to say is "We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn't represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that's the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome."
But if that's so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.
We endorsed Harris with a Venn Diagram.
It’s a way to reframe the argument from a vote FOR a milquetoast candidate, to one AGAINST a would-be Dictator.
Know that none of the 3 possible options for voters will immediately stop Israel’s current terror campaign on Palestinians and the Lebanese.
Instead, all it does is set up the future environment and Government whom you can influence the actions of. Only ONE option provides an opportunity which could reign Israel back in, and it sure as shit isn’t a possible 2nd Trump administration.
Yes, but I imagine the roundabout is to maintain pressure.
I want Kamala to win but I also want her to fix the fucking gaza problem, and she can't be allowed to forget that.
Yep. But they’re still uncommitted about it, so it’s fine.
They recommended not to vote for a third party candidate and vote for someone else who can block Trump. I wonder who that person could be 🤔
The dark horse candidate: Al Gore
It's a two party system. Doing anything else but voting for Harris is helping donnie, which is only going to make the situation in Gaza even worse if he wins.
There isn't a place on the planet that will get better if he wins.
Russia will, or at least the parts where putin owns
The mansions and luxury resorts of oligarchs?
(By which I mean oligarchs the world over, by whatever name they may be called. At some point, nationality stops mattering if you're mega-rich and just becomes a means to consolidate even more power.)
Seems like there's an easier way to go about that...
Leftists and enlightened centrists unified in disdain for both parties, but knowing they've got to do their bit to stave off the rise of fascism.
It's nice that they won't endorse the fascist, but how bad is it if you can't endorse the nonfascist.
The irony. Uncommitted to the very end.
Carl Beijer is a blogger, and doesn't seem to be an academic. It's a pen name, so it's impossible to tell, but I've never heard of an academic publish under a pen name. Just because he says their's an academic concensus doesn't mean there is one. He has to prove it.
I haven't finished reading this, but I'll probably leave a new comment when I do.
Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Mother Jones:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
Showing that good democrat stick-to-it-iveness that we all know and love.
I’m voting psl in November and so can you.
Cool!
Didn't ask 🤷