Everett True promotes gun safety (September 23, 1918)
Everett True promotes gun safety (September 23, 1918)
Printed 106 years ago today in The Chattanooga News.
Found on the Library of Congress site.
I love that line.
It's not about being able to hit things you aim at, it's about missing the things you AREN'T aiming at.
"Empty your mind, do not stir your feet,
And miss the things you are not shooting at."
- Everett True, Taoist Master
I don't like guns, but if you have to go hunting you should at least know how to shoot straight.
Also note: the list of the war dead from recent World War I actions on the same page as the comic. The US had entered in April 1917. By September 1918, Germany's last great offensive had failed and the Allied Hundred Days Offensive was in progress; this would lead to the Armistice of 11 November 1918, and the Treaty of Versailles the following year. By that point over 20 million people will have died and about the same number wounded.
I really think gun licenses should have a similar process to driver's licenses. When I got my driver's license, I had to do 32 hours of classroom teaching, then 8 hours of student driving, and then pass a written and practical test. A gun license should be the same, or more stringent, and also require renewal through an office like the DMV every few years. And if the licensing instructor doesn't think you'll be a safe gun owner at the end of the test, then no license for you, go back to class and you can take the test again in 6 months.
I think this would be a lot more effective gun control than all the piecemeal regulations about various types or technical features of guns.
In my state you can take a class that gets a special marker put on your driver license forever (took it when I was maybe 10 and it's marked today) but so far as I gather it's just some sort of trophy badge rather than having any function. Even something like that as a pre-req wouldn't be a bad start when the baseline now is just don't be a felon.
Ah the war to end all wars as it was known. The great war! You don't need anymore wars after THIS world war!
.........why are you guys calling it World War 1??! THERE'S A SEQUAL???
Unfortunately, most of WW1 dead were from diseases, followed closely by artillery.
but if you have to go hunting you should at least know how to shoot straight.
I'm almost certain that every single State requires passing a Hunter Safety program before you can get any kind of Hunting License. The laws have changed a lot since 1917.
Thanks for this! I also noted the ad for Asbestos Insulation for your heating pipes.
When I turned 12, my dad took me to a hunter safety course. I didn't really think I was all that interested in hunting but he was, so we went.
We went hunting a few times. I usually ended up falling asleep on a log or something, so he just went without me.
I've never owned a gun while living in my own, but I know how to safely use one if I have to.
I really don't know why it isn't mandatory.
I really don’t know why it isn’t mandatory.
In the United States firearms education should be mandatory. It's not because the anti-gun crowd loses their fucking minds whenever it comes up.
The NRA has funded and run a program called "Eddie Eagle" for decades that teaches basic firearms safety and accident reduction to kids and it's been slowly driven out of schools.
You can find a plethora of articles online but here's an example: https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2022/02/15/bill-require-gun-safety-nra-eddie-eagle-program-schools/6800808001/
Here's another example from Kansas: https://www.kmbc.com/article/kansas-bill-would-require-school-gun-safety-program/39432200
The legislature passed it, the Dem Governor VETOED it!
Wrap your head around this for a minute. Here's Republicans and the NRA (fuck those guys) trying to do a "common sense" thing and getting lambasted for it. I can understand having an issue with the NRA (fuck those guys) but there's been absolutely no counter proposals or attempts at creating something similar without NRA involvement.
We NEED firearms education in this country but we're losing what little we did have and attempts at adding more are continually thwarted by the very people screaming from the rooftops about "Common Sense Reform".
It the same stupidity that Republicans have with Sex Ad. It's education vs ignorance. We need education.
2A types generally lose their minds over anything that might imply a restriction on ownership. I think it's not because they don't approve of the thing -- whatever it is -- but they see it as a slippery slope, and that The Liberals will just keep adding more straws to the camel's back until it's not practically legal.
For instance, if you troll around in the pro-gun forums, you'll often come across people saying things like, "every gun owner should also own -- and know how to use -- a trauma kit"; or jumping down the throats of any poster posting a picture where someone isn't practicing trigger discipline; or derides the people in a video where someone inadvertently (thoughtlessly) waves a gun at someone else. Even presumably "pro" gun YouTubers are usually careful to show that the weapon they're handling is unloaded when they're doing something with it that isn't shooting, and it's not because of YouTube's increasingly stringent gun video rules: it's because otherwise their comment section will be filled with gun people criticizing good gun ownership habits. So it's demonstrable that the wider gun-owning community is pro gun education and safety, and you'd think adding laws that support these beliefs would be no-brainers -- but they aren't. It's when it comes to codifying the socially-enforced rules into law that the community stomps on the brakes and becomes mulish.
Personally, I believe that this is a silly position to take; relatively few people object to drivers being required to take driving tests, and nobody complains about driver's ed classes in pub ed. Cars are dangerous. So are guns. IMO you should need to take a test, get a gun license, and then be able to buy and carry (concealed if that's what floats your boat). Just like a driver's license, you'd need to retake the test whenever you move to a new state, but otherwise it's essentially a one-time test. Just put the same restrictions on guns that we do cars, and do away with most of the other laws. Maybe rifles are like basic licenses, handguns are like motorcycles, and machine guns are like tractor-trailer semis: you take a different test to get a different kind of license allowance for each. And treat guns like cars: when you buy a gun, you register it just like you'd do a car, whether it's a private or commercial sale. Move to a new state, register your guns there, just like you have to do with cars.
Gun control is a massive source of contention between liberals and conservatives, and we're never going to overturn the 2A in the states. I don't know if the 2A crowd would agree to treat guns like cars if it meant eliminating a whole mess of other legislation around guns which are of questionable efficacy to begin with. Absolutely, getting rid of all of the guns in the states would have a huge public safety impact, but I don't believe it's a realistic expectation that will ever happen; whereas mandatory training/education, testing, and licensing I think would improve things, and might be a reasonable middle-ground acceptable by both sides. Like they say in Lower Decks: "if both sides are equally unsatisfied with the negotiation... THAT'S A COMROMISE!"
Firearms education is only necessary when there are guns all over the place. The people you're complaining about don't want guns around to begin with. Not to mention the inherent propaganda that is 100% built into any children's content produced by Republicans and the NRA. If the goal of Democrats is to increase gun control and reduce the amount of guns among the general populace, it doesn't really make sense for them to want NRA propaganda in schools. That said, I do agree that while there are all these guns around, parents should generally do a better job to make sure their children get this information, whether their family owns a gun or not.
I agree, but I do know why it isn't mandatory in the US: It would be against the constitution because it would restrict the right to bare arms and would disproportionately impact second amendment rights of lower income Americans.
I really don't know why it isn't mandatory.
Yeah you do: corruption and demagoguery.
But, my freedumbs!