Skip Navigation

Religious LGBTQ+ folks who are also anarchist have no safe place to speak their minds, and I think it's a shame.

I am interested in a community of people of faith who are at the same time on the political left, particularly anarchism, and lgbtq+ inclusion, particularly transgender. I am kinda sick and tired of atheists harassing everyone religious. I don't care much about the philosophy surrounding it, it is just that their collective behavior is arguably harassment, not a bit different to typical transphobic harassment about delusions etc. I believe that freedom of religious belief is a very basic right for people of all convictions. At the moment there is a huge divide: religious lgbtq+ people who are also anarchist (and might have been ostracized by their religious community on top of everything else) have no place to go without facing atheist harassment, and this is how there is no place to discuss faith together with politics and identity. So, here goes, I want to start this discussion with people who would like to see sth like this happening.

27 comments
  • Gonna go against the grain and say that you are totally valid for wanting a space that is accepting of your faith, politics, and identity.

    As an anarchist, I get being ostracized for political beliefs for sure. I myself am non-religious but have met a lot of Christian and Muslim anarchists. It's hard finding leftist spaces that aren't rapidly anti-religious on the best of days, let alone ones that are also lgbt positive. Wish I had easy solutions.

    I run a community for trans feminine people where anyone is allowed to post regardless of their faith. I'm pretty sure most of the other lgbt spaces on blahaj.zone would be open to the kinds of discussions you're interested in.

    • Seconding this! Honestly the aggressive anti-religious attitude that seems to be popular on Fedi and (and big subreddits as well) annoys me to no end, and it always has an air of wanting to feel superior about it.

      Spirituality can be a good, helpful, thing that anyone should be allowed to practice. It doesn't help that people always seem to equate religion itself with big institutions or particularly bigoted sub-groups.

      I don't know if this incoherent rant makes any sense, anyway you're valid and I support you!

  • I don't have a need for this sort of community, but if you want a queer theists comm you should try making one. Though there may not be enough folks to sustain it; here on lemmy there often just aren't enough people to sustain small niche communities because if there aren't posts, nothing shows up on people's feed, and people forget the community exists. Which is a challenge since most people just lurk and don't post.

    As an atheist myself I really don't see why so many people have decided to attack you for your way of relating to the world, unless there's some context I'm missing. The important thing is that you're kind, not whether you think there's a god or not.

    Judging people for their demographic like what religion they subscribe to rather than how they treat people is stupid. If you're a dick you're a dick, and if you're not a dick you're not. It's not complicated.

    I don't give a shit if someone is religious, I give a shit if you're kind. My apologies for the shitty attitude of replies in this thread OP

  • It would help if you identified which religion. There absolutely is a vibrant queer pagan community, but it sounds like that's not what you're talking about.

  • Putting personal thoughts aside, Imma be blunt and say this seems kinda hyper-specific for a community.

    • Christian anarchism is actually one of the oldest forms of anarchism. Many early anarchists were Christian and derived their political beliefs from gospel.

  • Each day on Lemmy I scroll and scroll and then I reach a headline where after reading it I have to parse what it says. And then I realize it's gibberish. And then I realize it's the bottom of the feed and what I'm reading has a negative score.

    Today this was that post.

    • Love your lack of interest in learning about people with different beliefs and identities from you.

      • That's certainly one way to read it. Except you don't know anything else about me. The problem isn't the interest in other identities. The problem is the complete clusterfuck of identities presented in that headline. Each additional descriptor narrows down the field of people it's talking about until you end up with n=1. It's so incredibly niche that most people, including myself, can't even picture what must be going on in the heads of these people. Maybe if there was a poster child that would help. But it would take a 30 minute podcast interview to delve into all of those aspects and help it all make sense. Just trying to square the religion plus anarchy section makes the brain hurt. And then we get more niche after that.

27 comments