TIL 40 states in the US charge you $20-$80 a day for being incarcerated in prison.
TIL 40 states in the US charge you $20-$80 a day for being incarcerated in prison.
Very weird that I am so old and have literally never heard this mentioned in a TV show or book or movie or anything.
In four out of five states, if you go to prison, you are literally paying for the time you spend there.
As you can guess, this results in crippling debt as soon as you're released.
The county gets back a fraction of what they hold over your head the rest of your life until you commit suicide(or die naturally and peacefully with the sword of damocles hanging over your head).
$20-$80 a day according to Rutgers.
Counties apparently sue people and employ wage garnishment to get back the money that majority of people obviously cannot pay back.
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/states-unfairly-burdening-incarcerated-people-pay-stay-fees
You're viewing a single thread.
That's the beauty of both ruling parties being 100% in support of the prison industrial complex. In fact, our current president even helped usher through the '94 Crime Bill, which keeps prisons nice and full for his golf buddies and institutional donors.
Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change. Yes, Biden was pretty shit back in the 90s, but it actually feels a little bit like he's trying to move back in the other direction. Don't gotta forget the bad, but also can't forget the (attempts at) good
Right it's important to remember 94 was literally 30 years ago. Attitudes can change significantly in that time.
Yeah, he wants to be known as a good guy. Look at GW Bush. They all want to be known as good guys late in life. Gates, Buffet, et al.
Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change.
Yeah, but Biden hasn't.
Remember when he mocked 'Defund the Police' in his first state of the union address?
He's an authoritarian. Always has been, and he's been a reliable vote in favor of every regressive piece of legislation that's led the country to this point, where fascism is becoming normalized.
Oh, please. If he was an authoritarian, he would behave like Trump or any other authoritarian ruler out there.
Remember when Trump was president? He would kick reporters out of the white house, or tear gas people in front of the white house for a photo op. He said stuff like "I totally won't do this," then the very following day, he would do that. His speech was divisive. Should I go on?
Just because Trump was more personally belligerent doesn't change the fact that Biden is an authoritarian.
You just spotted my flawed argument. True. Biden is not authoritarian, though.
Tell me how is Biden authoritarian, Russian Agent #4557?
Going ad hominem just makes you look sillier.
And yet, the only person I'm thinking of mocking is you
Right, because you're insecure about the fact that you can't rebut my replies.
The problem with that is we all have to suffer for the insistence of you and yours to elect these people.
Funny the left feels the EXACT same way, report to your handlers/Putin your job was done for today and some fresh air would be a good idea.
I asked you a question, Chat GPT spawn. Answer it.
People change as the issues become more apparent, when Obama was elected he said he "Respected the LGBT Community" but firmly believed "Marriage is between a man and a woman"
This same president gave us Gay Marriage in all 50 states
He's had some policies I agree with, that move us towards a less police state level. I admit, I haven't followed him super closely, he's less interesting than things have been lately, but at least the federal decriminalization of marijuana and pardons (I know they were effectively useless, didn't really do anything - we can get into exactly why) show he's at least trying to do what constituents want, which is a far cry more than a lot of other politicians.
Can he, should he, do more? Yeah. But credit where it's due, he seems like he's trying to steer two giant ships - his own past biases, and the United States political climate. Both of those are slow and hard to do, so anything moving in that direction should be celebrated.
Don't be fooled, Joe doesn't give a shit about decriminalizing any substance, after all, he wqs the biggest proponent of the RAVE act
See, this is EXACTLY my point. We all get obsessed over the things of the past, and while those can help inform us of the present, they're not actually the present.
Yes, he was a proponent of the RAVE act. That's one of those "don't forget the bads" that I mentioned. We can accept that, and also accept that he seems to have lightened up on that BS in recent times.
No one's perfect, everyone changes their minds about things. You did horrible things in your past too, almost certainly. That's not you, we can accept that, but for politicians it's this unchanging thing - you supported one thing, you will always continue supporting that thing.
Let people grow. Let ideas be brought up, and shot down. Let mistakes be in the past, and start focusing on what's actually happening in the present.
It's not about "being obsessed with the past" it's about paying attention to history, particularly a certain person's history. Joe biden had not been even remotely interested in legalization/decriminalization until he started running for office. Joe Biden was already an old man when he pushed for enforcement of the RAVE act along with other drug bills, I can maybe understand his "concrete jungle" statements from the 70's, but we are literally talking about barely over 20 years ago.
All I am saying is to be cautious and not too trusting, ESPECIALLY of politicians.
Right. As I said, you can use the past to color your present, but the thing that matters presently is present actions and, to a lesser extent, words. So, judging him based on his actions during presidency, which should show us either his current beliefs or, at least, his willingness to listen to constituents.
During his presidency, he's been... Well, I won't say stellar, but his actions have been more in line with someone who actually wants better, rather than someone who wants to cling to old habits. Again, could he do more, yes. But his record -recently- has been, for a politician, pretty good.
You bring up the RAVE act. That was 20 years ago. 20 of the most eventful years in at least modern history. Do you think someone is incapable of change for 20 years? I know I've changed drastically just in the last 2 or 3 years. I mean, yeah, he's old, but I've seen old people change too. Might not come full revolution, change is slow, but again - any progress is worth acknowledging and celebrating.
Is there something he's done during his presidency that leads you to believe he's still got those same values from prior? We can talk efficacy of some of his planned solutions, and some of his lack of a spine, but I think overall his actions are consistent with his words, in this regard.
I agree with you for the most part, but at the end of the day, you have to take someone in power action by action. Everyone who has ever held office has pretty much done at least one or two good things for their community. I'm not saying that I'm totally anti Joe Biden, but I think that he (like all politicians) can be full of shit sometimes. Remember back when he got elected, he proceeded to undo everything trump did about border control and even made that a big part of his campaign? As of late, he has slowly been reimplementing those policies. I think Biden is someone who rides off emotion and public feedback in relation to followers of his party, which can be a good thing but it can also be a bad thing.
When in most of our lifetimes has the u.s. presidental election not been 'the lesser of two evils'?
This excuse, to me, seems to emphasize the necessity of a third-party vote even more.
Liberals hate the fact they openly support a right wing segregationist authoritarian
They don't hate that fact enough, unfortunately.
RAVE act
so then vote for trump, right? gtfooh
Oh no! somebody criticized Biden!
criticize him all you want... after he's elected.
we all hate the either/or state of american politics, but it's still the reality. live in reality, ppl.
after he's elected
what?
what don't you understand about my statement?
Re-elected, of course.
You consent to all these issues with your vote for Dems. I on the other hand will express democracy by voting for a candidate that opposes this: Jill Stein.
you mean to tell me you're going to vote for jill stein in november? what state do you live in? it better not be a battle ground state
Absolutely, because she is the candidate of the largest party I agree with.
Biden or Trump winning is a major loss. Instead build a better party instead of complaining.
People should do that... After this election that is.
Hilarious. Where have liberals been after 2016? 2020? The time is now, and you are trying your best to maintain the control of our government by the rich.
And risk Trump presidency? No thanks.
You in 2028 after doing nothing for 4 years: "And risk (insert Republican here) presidency? No thanks."
While the country goes to shit.
Biden or Trump winning is a major loss.
They aren't equal. They're both shit, but they aren't equal. And I don't know about you, but I'd rather keep my right to vote, which is under threat thanks to the likes of Trump.
Instead build a better party instead of complaining.
Not seeing anything you've built. All I see is you complaining about Biden and Trump.
If you want better, we need electoral reform. Our current system is mathematically biased against third parties.
I’d rather keep my right to vote, which is under threat thanks to the likes of Trump.
Why didn't Trump use these magical powers he supposedly has to take away our right to vote?
Not seeing anything you’ve built. All I see is you complaining about Biden and Trump.
https://www.gp.org/ Where is yours? What have you done to oppose the rich controlling our government? You consent to it.
If you want better, we need electoral reform. Our current system is mathematically biased against third parties.
Yes, that's why I vote for candidates that support ranked choice voting.
You vote for candidates that oppose ranked choice voting.
See how you have no solutions here?
Why didn’t Trump use these magical powers he supposedly has to take away our right to vote?
Because it took them time to rig the SCOTUS.
https://www.gp.org/ Where is yours?
Yeah, a party that has won exactly zero presidential elections what a party you've built. How proud you must be.
What have you done to oppose the rich controlling our government? You consent to it.
A man abducts you and gives you to choices:
-
Have sex with him "willingly"
-
He kills you, and has sex with your corpse
Choosing the first option in no way is consensual.
Yes, that’s why I vote for candidates that support ranked choice voting.
Good for you.
You vote for candidates that oppose ranked choice voting.
Factually incorrect.
Because it took them time to rig the SCOTUS.
Exactly what law do you expect them to pass? This is all Dems fault for being so garbage that Republicans even have a chance.
Yeah, a party that has won exactly zero presidential elections what a party you’ve built. How proud you must be.
You have to vote for them to win dumbass.
A man abducts you and gives you to choices: Have sex with him “willingly” He kills you, and has sex with your corpse Choosing the first option in no way is consensual.
You are truly deranged. In this comparison you could choose neither and vote green party.
Factually incorrect.
Biden supports RCV? Which Dem?
-
How do you think you get electoral reform? Because the democrats sure as hell are never gonna give it to you if you keep voting for their garbage bottom of the barrel candidates. American politics really are a shit show, you're trying to act like you're the reasonable one but getting so damn belligerent.
How do you think you get electoral reform?
Mass protests, general strikes, voting in progressives that actually stand a chance, etc.
Because the democrats sure as hell are never gonna give it to you
I know they won't, which is why you vote in the primaries.
You know who sure as hell are never gonna give it to you? Third party candidates. You can't make reform if you don't get voted into office in the first place.
you keep voting for their garbage bottom of the barrel candidates.
Genrrallt you don't get bottom of the barrel candidates if you actually work to put forth good candidates in the primaries. And a bottom of the barrel democrat with always be better than an outright fascist republican.
you’re trying to act like you’re the reasonable one but getting so damn belligerent.
Hey, if you don't like how I'm responding, maybe don't start with saying things like
- "build a better party instead of complaining."
Practice what you speak.
Name one time when you havent gotten a bottom of the barrel candidate? Look what they did to my boy Bernie. He wasn't even ideal but at least he had a shot and the democrats you're praising tanked him. They're playing you, intentionally holding up an awful boogeyman constantly and saying "if you don't vote for our piece of shit we're gonna give you the bigger piece of shit." The only way to win is not to play their game. Maybe if they lose enough voters they'll get the message but they sure as hell won't if you keep letting them win.
I vote third party.
Choosing between a giant douche and a turd sandwich isn't very appealing to me.
Also, people like you pretending you didn't need the votes of people like me is how we got Trump in the first place.
sure. hold humanity hostage because you can't get exactly what you want, traitor. i'm not going to kiss your ass to vote for practical results. if you're too blind to see what you're doing, you can live with the consequences. i have a feeling you have a lot more time left on this planet than i do, junior.
Jesus Christ, you're calling another person a traitor over... this. XD
You Americans are like a bad parody. What a terrible farce this is.
In a two party system, voting third party will only ever result in your vote being thrown out. It is taking a stand against reality for the sake of your own personal idealism.
A lot of left-aligned voters learned that lesson the hard way in 2016. If you didn't learn the lesson, you either weren't paying attention or your idealism is more important to you than the actual outcome of the vote.
Doing that willingly, despite (or maybe because) the rest of your side screaming at you not to fuck this up again, is absolutely a level of betrayal.
Yeah, this whole explanation is just you saying "Our country is broken and I don't want to fix it".
More like "you think you're helping but you are not"
Yea OK, just keep voting for same parties over and over again. Let's just maintain the shitty status quo where nothing really gets better regardless of who is in office!
So your solution is to vote in protest for a party you know won't win.
I'm actually curious now, what possible good do you think that's doing?
Blah blah blah same propaganda, same lies. Even a fool could say you're trying to get Trump elected.
