World hunger is not just about food waste but also unequal distribution on an international scale. When China develops a rice variety that grows in salty marshes or Brazil develops a soy variety that grows in savannah conditions, you give countries in the Global South the opportunity to grow food not only locally but much more productively. At that point the problem becomes a matter of solving the underlying issues with international financing, which is one of the things Michael Hudson is talking about.
This rice variety seems like a godsend even in a liberal capitalist hole like Brazil.
At that point the problem becomes a matter of solving the underlying issues with international financing, which is one of the things Michael Hudson is talking about.
I agree, but you need the potato to have a potato famine (read: British occupation exporting food like they did in India and other countries while the people starve)
CDC: One Neat Trick to Not Die; Funeral Directors Hate Him
it's incredible how purchased ads trying to aesthetically appear like headlines have had such a dramatic impact on the crafting of editorial headlines.
it's almost like the NEWS under capitalism was always going to suck as the distinction between its press and advertising/marketing are functionally the same.
The US will no longer be able to dump cheap agricultural goods on developing countries thus undermining their food security and making them reliant on the exports of empire.
It'll be a good start. The most important thing though will definitely be overthrowing the evil empire which disincentivizes and works to prevent agricultural self-sufficiency across the global south (Prof. Michael Hudson has a great talk on this and more), which uses illegal sanctions and destabilization (like in Syria where they openly state the prime agricultural and oil-producing regions are specifically targeted for occupation) to manufacture famines, and which threatens the shipping lanes of the entire globe.