Between this, my stripes, and my tail.. all things I have genes for, but no activation...
I'm kinda pissed, being human could be far less cringe
Humans do have stripes but we ourselves can’t see them.
Look up Blaschko lines
Behold, a feathered biped
Plato is gonna be fuckin pissed
This sounds like a fun PhD project
No funding. Less fun
If people had wings and could fly it would be considered exercise and nobody would do it.
Americans wouldn't do it, the rest of the world would
Why would I fly for twenty minutes when I can drive for an hour 🙄
I’m good on the feathers I read the goosebumps book about learning to fly and it gave me a preview of my trypophobia when R.L. Stine described the feathers growing out of the main characters skin
ETA: it was “chicken chicken” not “how I learned to fly”
Huh? I just read this book and that was not in there. The kids just drank a potion and then could fly, there was no outward difference to them. Maybe you are mixing up a different one, like the chicken one? We just started that so idk how it goes. The cover has the girl as a chicken though.
Ahh I checked the synopsis and you’re right I definitely got it mixed up with another. I need to find it now.
ETA:Definitely the chicken one jeez it just gave me goosebumps
MF walking one way into getting a pile of teratomas
Stunning creatures, sea lions.
Wonderful plumage.
Fierce Creatures (1997)
There's certainly something stunning and wonderful in that picture all right
Her shoes
I also have a thing for short guys in glasses!
TIL evolution is bad at deleting legacy code
We just comment it out in case we ever need it again.
I want the damn feathers for the social aspect! If we were allowed to preen each other, the world would be a better place!
What does that even mean, you have like “four letters” and dna strands of millions long. Like how selective do you have to be. I’m sure you can basically write anything that way.
Are there entire chunks that are inactive that would give feathers, that at some point gave feathers to our ancestors?
I recall that scientists reactivated chicken genes for teeth and grew a toothed chook
All things DNA is full of code that doesn't get activated and is just passed on anyways
Gene expression is what they mean by "activated"
Basically think of it like having a library of instruction books and only grabbing a few of them to do the project that needs done.
DNA contains coding and control regions. Changes to the coding regions are rare, most of the evolutionary stuff is happening within those control regions instead. Mutations there are more likely to result in interesting effects by affecting the way genes activate and interact, while the coding regions do the heavy lifting.
Losing some feature could be as simple as a mutation that permanently switches off the control region of a gene, even if the gene itself and the interactions formerly coded around it still work. Over time, those accumulate mutations and degrade, since they are not useful and therefore evolution doesn't preserve them, but they are still there. For example, we have an inactivated gene that used to make an enzyme that would break down uric acid. So we get gout, but our ancestors didn't.
I agree, this seems pretty misleading. And are there any other feathered animals other than on the dinosaur branch? Because if not, how should the feather DNA even end up in mammalian DNA?? Or maybe feathers are produced by very common differently used genes? But in this case this would be even more nonsensical...
Quick someone get CRSIPR therapy
Now go into a forrest with flint and boom
infinite ammo
