AI sucks
AI sucks
35 comments
-
AI is fantastic.
It's what it's being used for that fucking sucks.
I love reading about shit like "LLMs help scientists develop new pattern-seeking behaviors and theories" and shit. Fucking hate when I see AI art or places trying to 'streamline' their processes with half-assed AI assistance.
-
This. I was a phd seeking cybersecurity researcher leaning heavily into AI up until last year, and it bothered me to no end that some of the most promising technology I have ever seen was being primarily used to enhance the police state or increase BP profits by a few %. AI is literally a step towards a utopian post scarcity future, but instead of being used that way it was immediately weaponized against the working class for the benefit of the parasite class.
-
The mad "gold rush" mentality towards AGI is nerve-racking. I'm reminded of Protogen's attitude towards the Protomolecule in The Expanse.
I figured we still had 5-ish years to figure it out, but the rapid progress against HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) makes me nervous.
But sure, let's just rush headlong towards the precipice, how hard can alignment be really? My anxiety about the future and the importance of getting this right are not eased by people scoffing because "just count the fingers!" When the field is changing so fast, looking at what was going on a few years ago isn't helpful.
Well, past my pay grade.
-
I don't understand what this has to do with a PhD in cyber security but I do agree with what you said though
-
-
AI as a concept is amazing, and some applications it’s being used for are equally amazing. It’s the mainstream AI drivel that I fucking hate.
But there’s also these things that put me off:
- the glaring lack of ethics behind the companies pushing it (Meta and Open AI for example) which is more a capitalism problem than anything
- the fact that it was built on plagiarism without consulting with artists and authors (who probably would’ve been open to the idea if it was presented with a level playing field)
- the fact that it always hallucinates (I can’t get it to stop making up arbitrary bullshit no matter what I do)
- the resources required and the stress it places on power grids and the environment (puts it out of reach for most end users since it requires a killer rig)
- the massive shortage of GPUs and the huge price hike (which we can also thank crypto for)
The idea of being able to run smaller models locally is amazing and everyone should play around with them. I find it to be fun for toy apps and experimenting, but I’ve yet to see a single good use case from the multitude of companies using it (with the exception of cases like you mentioned).
-
Yep. Automation, machine learning etc should be used to get rid of bullshit jobs so that people have more time to invest in art and stuff. Instead, "AI" is used to get rid of artists so more people work bullshit jobs.
But at the same time, there are some great fucking uses for machine learning. For example, my father's an anesthesia nurse and told me, at his hospital doctors use it to analyze imaging results like MRI and CT. A technician controls the results but a trained tech needs so much less time for that than to analyze the images AND the machine analysis actually misses fewer details and are more precise than humans.
But "AI art" is still cancer.
-
Same with crypto. Both have potential, but are being misused instead.
-
What do you use it for?
-
I personally use it to make art for my FOSS game I make as a hobby.
-
Me, personally? Nothing. Prefer to go without AI.
-
Not OP that you asked, but I've used ai before to examine netflow data at the head of a medium sized network and identify malicious traffic via netflow anomaly, rather than the signature based methods that are used by current network intrusion detection systems. It's effectiveness is contingent on having good data that contains labeled malicious packets to train on, but it was pretty dope in lab conditions to watch a graduate ethical hacking class try to compromise my testbed network and my best performing ai powered intrusion detection algorithms were able to accurately flag something like 90% of the malicious traffic.
If we had an organization dedicated to creating like a modern version of the NSL-KDD dataset every 6 months or so I think this type of network intrusion detection system would be extremely effective.
-
-
-
I like the steak sauce
-
Lol no. If you don't know how to use a computer or a hammer, you don't say "computers suck" or "hammers suck", you buckle up and learn how to use them or pay someone to use it for you, or wait enough so it is dumbed down enough for you to use it.
This is basically the boomer equivalent of a Luddite reasoning LMAO 🤣
Skill issue + git gud
-
It's (genuinely) interesting that big-time AI enthusiasts always assume that if you dislike AI, it's because you don't know how to use it (and not because they have different priorities or have conceptual issues with it or such). It was the same thing with crypto and NFTs.
I know a good amount of very skilled developers who tried AI several times in different contexts, and always found the tradeoffs much too bad to be worth it (in terms of accuracy, precision, cost, speed, whatever), and yet they still get "oh you just haven't tried my favorite AI tool".
-
It is because most of the hate comes from ignorance.
The rest are the exception, not the rule.
-
-
How's that elmers glue on your pizza tasting? I'm sure all the artists that had their work stolen to feed the machine will get compensation aaaany day now.
Way to champion slop, real pro gamer move.
-
35 comments