Could be. The article tries to paint a picture where that isn't quite the case:
"Wells Fargo reported on Fed data showing several regions experiencing a tightening in credit availability and an uptick in delinquency rates, pointing to a growing financial burden on households."
"Specifically, the New York Fed noted an increase in financial pressure among families with high debt burdens. Similarly, the Philadelphia Fed observed a widening gap where low-income households are reducing their spending but incurring more debt, contrasting with high-income households that continue to spend freely."
It's not a complete picture so I guess people are free to fill in the gaps as they please, but I don't see anything definitive here.
I'm close to a thousand £ back in rewards over the few years I've been using it. It costs me £2 every month and i get a minimum of £20 back per month. But if I can pay for my car insurance or something truly big? Oh boy do my cash back go through the roof!
Could i live on debit alone? Sure. But then i wouldn't get hundreds back every year for simply using my card.
For a while, i wondered why Americans tend use their credit cards instead of debit cards but then it occurred that they are encouraged to use credit cards because you cant get into debt using debit cards and debt is very profitable.
Also debit cards don't earn cash back or points. I visit my cousins on airline points. Monitor your cards and make sure you don't exceed your budget, same as a debit card.
You also have to have credit to get loans. I ran into this issue when I bought a house. I hadn't had a credit card in years because it was too easy to get into debt. The only thing that saved me is I am on one of my folks credit cards for rare emergencies if I'm watching their house and something goes awry (like the dehumidifier shits all over the basement floor and needs replaced).
Do you understand why there are so many incentives to use credit cards? Your reply and those under you are listing why credit cards are the better choice, however I wonder if they all know they are being played.
Those that use their credit card and pay it off in full are subsidized by the number of people that spend beyond their means.
If you’re responsible with them you get a number of perks. Many cards have some mix of the following:
extended warranties on electronics
fraud protection (I had a credit card stolen and $17k charged to it, all forgiven)
pretty easy dispute system if someone fucks you (Iceland Air fucked me real bad on a canceled flight/voucher bs scam they were pulling on people during Covid. I filed a dispute and got all my money back)
% back on all kinds of purchase categories
free road side assistance
air miles
upgrades in flights
iirc some hotels and rental car companies require them
etc etc
I’ve never paid interest on a single card in my life because I always pay my balance in full. Works out great for me. If you’re bad with money, I’d stay way.
There are a lot of consumer protections on credit cards that do not apply to debit cards. I pay for basically everything with a credit card. I pay the card off every month.
It’s also because a lot of people see the rewards as ways of getting free money. However that’s really only the case if you pay your card regularly. As well some Americans truly don’t have the required income to live. So they go into debt. It’s terrible, sad, and wrong on so many levels, but it’s a major part as well.
Lol that's cute. They've recently started changing this shit, but at least when I was in college, banks were 100% putting people into debt and making tons of money on overdraft fees. For using debit.
They had a program called, "overdraft protection" that customer service loved to sign you up for if you accidentally overdrafted. That should fix things right?
Lol no. Turns out what they meant by "protection" was "protection from your card being declined." In other words, if a purchase was going to put your account into the negative, instead of simply declining the transaction and preventing the customer from incurring a fee, it makes sure the purchase goes through, and the customer is charged $35 for overdrafting.
They also had a practice of re-ordering a customer's transactions in order to maximize overdraft fees. I believe this one has been illegal since Obama though.
Fair... but what I was alluding to is a banking crash that will make the "great recession" seem like a fart in the wind.
Think the LA riots, but in every major city, military being mobilised, civil war, the next violent revolution, what have you - because that debt hole will make a crater out of society.
And no, you don't want violent revolution. Why? Germans didn't become Nazis overnight. The economic collapse after WW1 put Germans in the position of being forced to bring wheelbarrows of cash to the store for a single loaf of bread. This made German people so desperate and angry that... well, you know the rest.
Stats from some googling. Assuming there are 250 million adults in US, and 80% have credit cards, that gives me 200 million holders, or ~$100 per person. That's not really a whole lot of money anymore. Not in a world where taco bell costs $20.
Stats from some googling. Assuming there are 250 million adults in US, and 80% have credit cards, that gives me 200 million holders, or ~$100 per person. That's not really a whole lot of money anymore. Not in a world where taco bell costs $20.
This could be another indicator that we are going into recession. I did not read the article (because who does that? 🤣) but when you look at rising credit card debt combined with the mass layoffs, it usually means folks are on their last legs, financially speaking.
That is assuming there actually is a problem with higher credit card debt and the topic is ‘t being sensationalized, of course.
Another indicator to watch out for is falling revenue in earnings reports. Falling revenue, particularly in retail and consumer goods spaces means recession is inbound.
I firmly believe that, absent some additional support, we will enter a recession within 2 years.
Note: I don’t claim to be an economist, but I am old and I have lived through a few of these downturns.