How would you put into words what gender means to you apart from societal gender roles and expectations?
I know that it has significant meaning to me but I struggle putting it into words to explain it to other people (especially other dya cis people). So like a few years ago I was thinking about if I may be trans femme. I have since realised that no, actually I was just struggling with it for a while because I don't relate to the gender roles and expectations society puts on men. I now identify more strongly with being a man than ever before, and I love being a man in a gender-way. I just absolutely hate being a man in a "what role men have in society"-way.
I just absolutely hate being a man in a âwhat role men have in societyâ-way.
I know exactly what you mean. A lot of random nonsense is seen as "unmanly" for no particular reason. I've seen grown ass men throw temper tantrums about doughnuts with pink glaze, because it is apparently uNmAnLy to even touch one, as if you would get a visit from the man police and they revoke your man card for even contemplating touching something in a "girly" color. It's just complete and utter nonsense.
It is a lot healthier to not give a flying fuck about gender roles - but also harder, depending on the society you live in. I have the luxury of being a big, bearded dude so not many people dare to openly mock me when I do "unmanly" stuff - I let my niece paint my nails whenever she wants. I cry when movies get emotional. The last dog I owned was a mini pinscher, and I still miss her. I don't like beer, cars, football/soccer/whatever. I bake and cook and I can get real passionate about it. I still own my first ever plushie.
...but I also have a bunch of friends who have been relentlessly bullied for similar stuff, gaslighted into believing that they deserved it for not being manly enough. And it breaks my heart every time I hear yet another story of someone killing their own passion, numbing themselves down to the point that they become unable to enjoy what they formerly loved, just to "fit in" a society that doesn't accept deviation from the perceived norm.
Fuck gender roles in general. All they do is make people miserable for not fitting in.
EDIT: The above statement is not meant to bash trans folk by the way. What I dislike are the expectations tied to certain societal "roles" and the almost automatic ostracisation by "the society" if someone isn't fulfilling enough of those expectations. Let people be who they want to be.
And it breaks my heart every time I hear yet another story of someone killing their own passion, numbing themselves down to the point that they become unable to enjoy what they formerly loved, just to "fit in" a society that doesn't accept deviation from the perceived norm.
Yeah I feel like that was an issue for me as well and one of the reasons I either repressed or resented parts of myself for a long time. And I'm glad the journeys I had the last couple of years (the one I described in the post and also the journey of overcoming depression) not only helped me accept those parts of myself, but be happy and proud that I have them.
People like what you describe are why I feel glad I live in a very queer friendly area, even though I'm not queer. It's just exhausting to deal with all the fragile egos in a repressed conservative area. I'm a cis hetero male, and queer people / allies respect the fact that even if I eat a pink-glazed donut, I am still a cis hetero male. I don't have to prove my fucking manliness to every triggered dude bro I see.
I had gone through the same self examination when I was younger, wondering about my sexuality and gender identity. I didn't really identify strongly with being a "man", and valued some of the more "feminine" traits I had. In the end, though, I found a peace in just being who I am. I still identify as a "man" and just embraced both the traits that reinforce that as well as break from the common mold. In the end, I came away from it finding gender kind of silly overall. I have no issues with individuals identifying themselves in any particular way, but don't really understand the need for gender at all in the larger scale of society.
My experience was similar, gender felt like an external expectation, mostly a limiting one, growing up as a girl. I didnât really internalize it besides accepting that it shapes how strangers receive and respond to me just like being short or ugly does.
That was my experience as a boy and now a man. It isn't inherently a negative thing because it is shorthand for expectations, but it becomes absolutely horrible when people try to force it on others instead of acknowledging that gender roles are generalizations and not written in stone.
Agreed. I identify as a man but have almost no attachment to that gender. The most I think about my gender is to double check the sign on the restroom. This is probably a lot of privilege though.
People all have different characteristics and personality traits that make them unique. It doesn't matter what society deems as "normal" for a man or a woman, do whatever you want.
But this is why I hate this non-binary rubbish. All that does is reinforce the traditional gender stereotypes, rather than breaking them down. Like, "I'm a man but I like this thing that's traditionally not what men like, maybe I'm non-binary". No, you're just a man who likes different things to what society classes as "normal". There's no need to make it more complicated.
Sorry for rant
There's a thing in sociology (or social psychology? I don't really know the difference) called "identity salience" that I think explains gender really well. Basically, people have any number of identities that describe them and they are of varying importance/salience. For example, it can be a big part of somebody's identity that they are a "father," but not a big part of their identity that they are a "driver" or "consumer." Maybe all those words can objectively be applied to this person, but he would likely identify strongly with one over the others. Similarly, right now I'm a "commenter" because I'm leaving a comment. That's something that objectively describes me, but I don't consider it to be an important part of my identity at all. Gender is just like any other identity; it's more or less important to different people.
There's already a distinction between sex and gender, even colloquially to an increasing extent, and gender is widely understood to exist as a spectrum or multiple spectrums. It's reasonable to believe that people who don't consider a traditional gender to be an important part of their identity could consider themselves non-binary.
It's true that gender stereotypes exist, but there are plenty of positive characteristics that are also associated with gender like "men are confident" or "women are understanding." If somebody doesn't identify with any of those characteristics or even stereotypes, then they might just feel like they're not accurately described by gendered words. Of course, somebody who doesn't fit the stereotypical idea of a certain gender can still be of that gender; it's all subjective.
If you're interested in simple, objective, binary gender, it's called sex, not gender. And even sex isn't simple, objective, or binary when you really get detailed.
Thanks for your contribution, I can tell you thought it out, but I don't think nonbinary people are nonbinary just because they don't fit into prescribed gender roles. I think it has more to do with the way people see themselves and whether or not they feel comfortable with particular labels such as "woman" or "she/her". At least for me, gender is something more innate, not something that informs how I interface with society.
The older I get and the more I learn, the more I have this opinion as well.
It really really doesn't matter how someone presents themselves, in so far as it doesn't impact their quality of life and the way people treat them.
Of course, it does impact the way people treat them, so it can't be ignored, but... if you're happy, respectful, and kind, it doesn't matter if you're man, woman, nonbinary, or any mix of any other gender.
At 35, Schevers is no longer saying she was wrong about everything, either in her transition or her detransition. She now identifies as âa transmasculine butch dyke, genderqueer, something like that,â she told me, and her she/her pronouns contrast with her male-sounding voice and masculine presentation. She doesnât think that every single detransitioned woman is really trans, and understands that others may have different experiences. Schevers believes strongly that every person deserves the right to question their gender identity and find their own paths.
She recognizes the good in her detransition experience, explaining: âThereâs not always space in trans and queer communities for transmasculine people to talk about internalized misogyny. I could talk about it openly without worrying that people were going to be upset by it.â She even sees the good in some of the ideology, which is based in radical feminist ideas about internalized misogyny and male violence. âNot all the radical feminist ideas were terrible either: I learned a lot about womenâs history,â Schevers said. âA lot of what I read was pretty interesting, so Iâm glad that I explored that stuff.â
The internalised misogyny she talks about there is thought to be responsible for a small percentage of the small percentage of trans men who regret it. They mistook the whole "girls are crap because they like wearing dresses and playing with dolls" idea that so many tomboys have as meaning that they are trans rather than that they were being indoctrinated by a gender-obsessed society.
I don't think anyone knows if transness would exist in a genuinely non-gender-based culture; I've seen the question asked a few times and the response has always been "no idea". Is it more than just I hate the stereotype of my sex so much I won't be forced to live down to it? (Note that this is subtly different to the internalised misogyny of the tomboy who hates the stereotype of their sex so much they despise members of the same sex.)
No one knows and I don't think anyone should care, either. I don't have to understand the deep bio-cultural science of transness, or have peer-reviewed studies to hand, to know that trans people exist and it is possible to not be an arse about it.
I've only ever heard the above argument made for tomboys (cis women) but I don't see why it would not also be something that cis men could experience. Just because everyone knows it's crap to be a girl doesn't mean it isn't also crap to be a boy. The gender binary is a mirror; you can't treat women differently without also treating men differently and not all of the differences favour men (and often, they make everyone worse off because most men are not members of the patriarchy, of course).
Are you trying to sleep with me / Iâm trying to sleep with you? Iâd like for you to have a vagina and preferably be straight or bi.
Otherwise I donât care about whatâs between your legs. Men can be caretakers, women can be construction workers, some random gender can be a computer programmer. I donât care, as long as the job gets done.
If itâs outside of the bedroom, gender / sex, means nothing to me.
I think the way we talk about gender and sex are very ambiguous because the term gender is overloaded to the tits.
I think itâs more accurate to think of gender identity and gender roles as completely separate concepts that shouldnât even share terminology.
Gender identity is like the sex of your brain, which can either be male or female or ambiguous / neither. Sexual dimorphism of the human brain has been observed and itâs been observed that trans peopleâs brains match their understanding of their own gender identity more closely than what they were assigned at birth. So with that knowledge we can assume that someone can be âmale brainedâ or âfemale brainedâ in as far as gender identity (or gender âmapâ)
Then you have âsexâ which when used in the traditional sense is your external sex (male, female, ambiguous / neither).
Then you have gender expression / roles, which to me is where the weasel words start to slip in. Gender expression is how one virtue signals to the rest of their tribe they are their brain (and maybe body) sex. This is somewhat personal and somewhat social, because we ultimately decide how we want to behave in the world so the world sees us for who we believe ourselves to be.
Gender roles are the rules society creates that youâre supposed to follow so everyone is playing with the same deck when it comes to understanding what you are supposed to virtue signal and what you are supposed to presume when receiving that signal.
Gender roles are 100% fake in that theyâre arbitrary and if they provide no net gain we can eliminate them. But gender is 100% real in that many people do experience strongly being their gender identity. If gender was totally fake trans people wouldnât exist. So you have to be precise about in what ways you mean something like âgender is fake just abolish gender roles and everyoneâs happyâ because itâs definitely used to invalidate trans people and thatâs not very cash money.
Do you think we could use ethnicity as an analogy? For example, one "ethnicity role" might be that Asians are supposed to own little convenience stores like Kim's Convenience, or something. That "ethnicity role" is completely ridiculous and shouldn't exist, but ethnic identity itself should/does exist, and some people will more readily practice their ethnic identities than others.
In my experience (and therefore my opinion as it relates to my own thoughts and feelings), *it's ineffable *and that is one of the reasons that it is so hard to communicate even mild dysphoria to people who don't experience it.
I am really very attached to being biologically female. Loved being pregnant, nursing, enjoy sex in this body. I would be utterly distressed to wake up in a male body.
Personally, I think of male/female as biological, manly/womanly as things defined by the entire set of people who consider themselves men, or women (like if you are a woman you are by definition womanly) and masculine/feminine as performance - if you were a genderless alien and trying to fit in here, or a man portraying a woman in a comedy, the things you would do to perform gender - clothing and behaviors that are more superficial.
I think probably the last two are gender. And yes you can be manly as fuck without being masculine. Perhaps more manly, because you don't feel you need to perform masculinity to be a man.
Humans are like computers, we have a biological hardware and a biological software. Gender is the software. Sometimes the software does not reflect the hardware. One (very rough) analogy I give for this is to suppose you have a Mac and someone installed Windows 10 on it. Yes, it's true that, on the outside, it's a Mac, but for all intents and purposes, it's a Windows 10 now. And in the long run, it shall be respected.
Nah, I don't subscribe to that analogy because it still implies that there are "male" bodies and "female" bodies when I think every woman's body is by definition a female body and every man's body is by definition a male body.
Humans are very much NOT binary when it comes to hardware. Intersex is a lot more common than people think though often in ways that aren't exactly visible. I know 3 intersex people personally that are all intersex in different ways.
Well, what does "being a man" mean outside of gender roles? There are physical attributes we have that women don't. We grow facial hair, we grow muscle more easily, we are on average taller, tend to have better spatial intelligence, higher rates of aggression, higher rates of risk taking, more men lay on the extremes of distribution curves
All of those are due to mostly physical attributes outside of any perceived gender roles.
What does being a man mean to me? Well, it means you protect and provide for the people in your life. It means you are kind but stern. Just but merciful.
I'm a very old-school traditional kind of guy relative to the new generation. I was raised by immigrants from a more conservative country - and while I am certainly not politically conservative, I do prefer conservative gender roles to an extent.
I like women that are feminine, I like women who cook for me, in my relationships I'm the more "stoic" one and the woman is usually more flamboyant/emotional.
Ultimately we all know gender roles are all societally based rules. But I figure a lot of our notions of life in society are also societally based rules.. doesn't mean they are useless. Men are soldiers because they tend to make better soldiers. Women are nurses because they tend to be more empathetic and less threatening.
These are partly due to biology, partly due to gender roles. It's an interesting question you bring up.
I am a man. It was never a question for me. I am male. I feel it in my bones. I feel it the same way I feel that I am human. It's a bedrock defining feature of me. I don't have to wonder or convince myself or others. I am male, and I don't feel like I have to act a certain way, because whatever I do is still male, by definition, because it's me doing it and I am male. QED. I wanna wear a pink dress or play with dolls, doesn't matter, still male. You don't like it, fuck you and your insecurity. I do what I want, deal with it.
Gender in general?
I think it's a spectrum, like almost all things. BUT, I think it's not an even distribution. There's a shit-ton of clustering near the ends of the spectrum ("cis male" and "cis female"). And I think for anyone who isn't heavily to one end or the other, there's a lot of confusion and "figuring out", especially because people love labels, and kids love labels even more than anyone else. And gen Z kids love labels even more than previous generations, for some reason.
And then compounding this issue is the social factors, which you've asked me not to discuss. But it's important to realize what is social pressure and what is just "gender".
Edit: and I'll also add that I feel bad for people closer to the middle of that spectrum, because the world we live in was not designed around them.
Males start as females before they differentiate and yet, both have a phallus (clitoris/penis), guys' ones are usually just bigger. We are all both, and either. It shouldn't be this big societal discussion, its just another way the rich arbitrarily divide us from realizing what's really going on
I'd like to humbly request you not do that. I like to see the comments of bigots, so I can vote them down and/or mock them.
But also, sometimes comments are misunderstood or have a good point among the bullshit. I feel like we should err on the side of leaving rather than censoring.
It's your post so it's your call, just giving my $0.02.
Similar to another poster, I break it down like this:
Sex is your physical binary biological gender. If you have a penis and testicles that produce sperm, you are a dude; if you have a vagina, ovaries, and a womb to carry a baby, you are a female. No ifs, ands, or buts about this imo.
Gender identity is what you identify as. This is where we go he/she/they, and can be completely removed from the biological sex of the person because gender is psychological and belongs to the sense of self. We use âheâ and âsheâ as binary identifiers of male and female species respectively, but with humans it becomes more complex as perhaps a male may identify as a female-gendered person, or a female may identify as a male-gendered person - or both of them identify as a non-gendered person.
Gender roles could (and I personally think should) be separated from both biological sex and psychological gender. This is what we, as human society as a whole, determine the division of labor and what activities, habits, and behaviors are acceptable for men and women. In the past when we were still growing as a species, this was actually important since men were needed to hunt down animals due to biologically being more suited to it and women were needed to do other things while the men were out; nowadays, however, this is a dated concept as anybody can earn money and we donât live in a world where we need to hunt to survive. Women can just as easily put food on the table and enjoy riding motorcycles or chopping down wood just as easily as men could stay at home, clean the house, take care of the kids, and cook meals for the family for when their partner gets home. If anything, I would say that we could consider the âMasculine/Feminineâ dichotomy as a sliding scale at best, but what society considers âmasculineâ or âfeminineâ changes all the time, so itâs arguably ultimately worthless trying to categorize this.
TL;DR Biological sex, gender identity, and gender role arenât all mutually inclusive. If I am a man, I am not beholden to the expectations of being a macho man who slams IPAs and lifts weights while talking about cars; on the flip side, if I am a man who identifies as a female, I am also not beholden to obtaining a BlĂ„haj shark plushie, wearing kneesocks all the time, losing 60 pounds, and becoming a software engineer who only runs Arch or some other Linux distro.
It's worth noting that humans do not come in a sex binary. Intersex is a lot more common than people think it is, just often in ways that are invisible. I know 3 intersex people personally that are all intersex in different ways. None of them would fall into either "binary" category.
Edit: To add to this, what about people with testicles that CANT produce sperm? Or people with a vagina but have had to have their womb removed due to a medical complication? These also don't fall under either definition given. Oftentimes rigid systems are only good for excluding people even if that isn't the intention.
Even if it's twice as common as most scientific studies believe it is, it's still less than a tenth of a percent of the population.
The fact that you know 3 intersex people says more about the company you choose to keep than it does about the prevalence in the average population.
Intersex people are important to keep in mind but we also need context here. Statistically, they're not a 3rd gender, they're a rounding error. They exist, but it's disingenuous to say something like "AHA, but you have failed to consider the tiny percentage of people who do not fit into your description!"
I think it's fair to say something like "sex is binary" in the same way it's fair to say something like "dogs have four legs". Yes there are dogs with 3 legs, but if we had to include every statistical rounding error every time we talked about something we'd never be able to say anything. Given the topic, I think Poggervania should have at least included a mention of intersex people, but let's not pretend that the world is split equally into male, female, and intersex.
If this bothers you, I challenge you to pick any noun and describe it. Literally any physical thing. Describe it to the best of your ability. I'll find something that you didn't include in your description.
Just because Iâm interested in archeology I thought I would share that evidence supporting a strong division of labour based on sex in ancient societies is pretty thin. There have been several articles lately arguing against that hypothesis due to finding skeletons of women buried with weapons and weapons that appear to be designed for lighter frames.
Oh sick - I did not know that! Thatâs really cool actually. Would this be from something like the Smithsonian Museum if I wanted to read up on this kind of stuff?
I am not in any way related to the medical field or have any sort of academic knowledge on this topic, with this said, I want to start by saying that I don't give a shit about if you identify as a man or a woman, let me know and I'll do the best I can to follow your wishes, I don't concider it being fantastic or terrible either way, as long as you are happy and no one else gets hurt, I am fine with it.
Now, I see gender as two variables, the physical and the mental. To me the physical gender variable is binary, but the mental gender is an analog variable that is basically an infinite spectrum.
I am a man, I was born a man, and I will die a man, this applies to both the physical and mental parts of me, however I make no secret that I sometimes do have thoughts about how life would be if I was a woman, I imagine feelings, think about facts of life for both men and women, both have a lot of advantages, and a lot of disadvantages, there have been times when I have wanted to be a woman, but reality allways comes back to that I am a man, mentally and physically, and in real life, I can't realisticly imagine me as a woman.
I do find pronoun checks really annoying, I listen to a podcast that does thise every episode, but I realize that that is my own problem and I don't have any right to make this someone else's problem, so I just accept it and move on.
i'm not going to bother to make a separation between sex and gender because i find that to be just a little bit of hair splitting nonsense.
with that in mind, i think the male and female aspects of human life are integral to what it means to be a human. i study a lot of mythology and i dabble a bit in paleontology and neuroscience. i believe that there are significant differences between the sexes that act like a yin and yang. i do think we are out of balance and that most societies are heavily weighted towards male aspects. furthermore, i think we would really benefit from leaning into the female side of our humanity.
i believe in a lot of things that most of you would consider old-fashioned but are actually rooted in thousands of years of well-documented human behavior. furthermore, i believe in science. i'll punch a guy that hits a girl and i have no shame in saying that.