The Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion (JEFF) Nuclear Data Library is a collaboration between NEA Data Bank participating countries. The JEFF library combines the efforts of its different Working Groups to produce sets of evaluated nuclear data, for fission and fusion applications.
https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_27365/the-jeff-nuclear-data-library
77 1 ReplySounds like something Jeff would say
32 0 ReplyBased acronym
4 1 Reply
I don't get what the deal is, I also have less than 10 nuclear warheads
28 0 ReplyFewer.
Grammar is still important even if you're in possession of WMD.
9 2 ReplySo, you're N. Korea?
1 0 ReplyBush: "Iraq has less than 10 WMD's, we gotta invade!"
1 0 ReplyCIA joins the call
1 0 Reply
After seeing Russia’s non-nuclear weapons, I honestly don’t believe they have that many nuclear weapons.
I’m not saying they have none, but I don’t think they’ve kept up the maintenance required for 7,000.
24 0 ReplyI mean, the actual number they have is irrelevant because there’s no way of knowing which ones are duds until it’s too late. If they were to launch a nuclear attack, the countries they’re attacking wouldn’t wait to see if it was a dud before responding. Because even if there’s only a 10% chance it detonates, that’s still 700 nukes detonating.
10 0 ReplyDeadliest game of bluff
1 0 Reply
Mos likely a lot of them are really old and not ik workikg conditions but they like to keep up the illusion that they could just nuke the whole globe
5 0 ReplySame goes for the US. Most launch facilities are in subpar condition.
2 1 ReplyI think that "subpar" are slightly different to US and Russia though.
8 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
25 2 ReplyOh, I thought "Jeff" was a joke, lol
4 0 ReplyIt's real but not bezos
20 0 Reply
My name jeff
12 0 ReplyAnd do you have less than 10 nuclear warheads?
8 0 ReplyYes
2 0 Reply
Your username as two, wait three names in it, and none are jeff. I am confused, flabbergasted and quite possibly bamboozled.
6 0 ReplyWhy do you need nuclear arsenals, Jeff??? Hmm???
3 0 Reply
Does anyone really need 7000 nuclear warheads?
8 0 ReplyDon't worry, they're just deterrents.
8 0 ReplyStill, I do worry.
4 0 ReplyUntil someone with the button thinks they can win.
2 0 Reply
Well, we needed more than the other guys and they felt the same way.
5 0 ReplyWell if you want to blow up all your enemies at once, yeah.
5 0 ReplyThe US had several tens of thousands in its heyday.
2 0 ReplyExactly what I asked your mom.
She's got three as dildos and two of them are of same size. Fucking hoarders smh.
2 0 Reply
Real advice: leave Jeff alone.
7 0 ReplyWow ordered list in descending order. 100-120 is somehow higher in the list than 110-130
6 0 ReplyI get the feeling this isn't real, some how
4 0 Reply
5 0 ReplyJeff!? As in Jeff!?!?
3 0 Reply