You're viewing a single thread.
Seriously, this kind of stuff is what makes most superhero movies/content so dumb. When they're getting tossed through buildings and causing literally trillions of dollars of damage every fight, while magically not hurting innocents or getting the world pissed at them, it completely removes it from any chance of being even realated to the real world.
Some of the best super hero content is great specifically because they at least attempt to keep things grounded in mortal reality. Unfortunately, the only one I can think of right now that exemplifies it well is the blatantly obvious The Boys.
Hopefully others know of way more/better ones. I know some content creators understand this problem, so there has got to be more than a handful.
I think this is what The Incredibles does very well. It throws you into a world with super heros, makes you think they're cool, then shows you what would actually happen to them when they start "saving" people and smashing up infrastructure. Probably one of the best super hero movies out there.
Yeah except in the modern day they'd have been protected by good Samaritan laws. It makes sense in those circumstances but basically what happened was the heroes getting sued and prosecuted for moving a non-responsive to the side of the road to avoid them getting hit by traffic.
That sounds ridiculous but that's literally an example from China where they don't have those protections. People suing helpful bystanders and arguing that them helping is them taking on responsibility.
Now granted, making 9/11 look like a scheduled demolition (don't crack wise conspiracy nuts) well stretches beyond what those exemptions might be able to cover, BUT, the heroes could get leniency if they can prove that they were trying to take the fight out of the city but the villain was refusing to be taken away from where they could harm civilians.
Man of Steel supes would have a hard time pulling that one off but the actual big blue boyscout would have ZERO trouble getting any legal consequences mitigated this way due to his outstanding record of public service outside of the fights. He probably ASKS the judge to bring the charges to create an opportunity to issue a public apology whenever something like this arises.
“Mr. Sansweet didn't ask to be saved. Mr. Sansweet didn't want to be saved. And the injury he received from Mr. Incredible's ‘actions,’ so-called, causes him daily pain…”
It’s this scene—dark as the implications may be—that really drives the point home.
Nah lmao. If the daily pain is so bad he can just kill himself again. And if he doesn't wanna die anymore, then good job Mr Incredible.
Or Hancock lol
The whole plot of the Captain America Civil War movie was built on the impact of collateral damage. For another franchise, The Watchmen movie was full of super hero atrocities and even the destruction of entire cities.
Ehh, I'd say the MCU largely ignored the problem and barely scratched the surface in Civil War. Though The Watchmen did a pretty solid job, given the crazy power levels of some of them.
I mean, Watchmen is a criticism of the superhero genre.
It deliberately goes against established tropes.Only the subject got dropped in favor of a personal drama between heroes. Honestly, they low keyed made Zemo the good guy.
The best superhero stories always have personal drama that parallels the high stakes battles. Also, the cause of the Zemo drama was what again? It was all about fallout from collateral damage.
The boys is much better at it
I don't know about better, but certainly more relevant to current events. You would not get The Boys without the disastrous social impacts of Trumpism.
Pretty sure the boys existed before Trump presidency.
Not the TV show. I don't know how faithful it is to the comic.
Hey, can't make an omelet...
I really like Marion G. Harmon’s Wearing the Cape series for this. Hero teams are governmentally regulated, and state or federally mandated, and have to work with local authorities whenever possible, often acting as first responders specifically regarding super villain events. They’re required to plan and mitigate collateral damage. Heroing is literally their job and they have standard and on-call hours, as well as patrols and the like.
Socially heroes and villains are treated kind of like celebrities, and there are sort of unwritten rules about no killing, and no going after civilian identities or people’s families outside of costume as that’s grounds for both villains and heroes to look the other way regarding the aforementioned “No killing” rule.
With the knowledge that villains are hard to impossible to fully stop, emphasis exists on imprisonment and rehabilitation, and over the course of the series some villains and heroes end up changing sides.
There’s one hero in the series who is a federal agent with the ability to replicate clones of himself and is embedded in most hero teams, as well as being secret service, generalized security, and informant as all clones have the knowledge of the rest. Nobody he works with outside of the President of the U.S. even knows how many of him are out there.
On top of this, besides the typical hero teams, there are more “B grade” teams that are not specifically super heroes but act as emergency responders and construction crews for both hero events and fights as well as generalized incidents, and things like heroes without borders that act as global humanitarian aid on a volunteer basis, similar to Doctors Without Borders.
Vigilantes are frowned upon, and can end up liable for crimes as they’re not sanctioned to use their powers to fight.
It’s a very interesting series, and deals with a lot of “real world” consequences of super heroics, including long term injury and death, PTSD and other trauma, and the impact of things like super powered terrorism and extremist groups, as well as anti-super sentiment.
——
Besides that series, I’d also recommend the web serial “Worm” by Wildbow (John McCrae), but that one’s a doozy, both in terms of content (it only goes from bad to worse and things never really get better) and length (it’s absurdly long, maybe equivalent in length to 15-20 full length novels, broken up into fairly long chapters and sections).
Dang, you've definitrly sold me on that. I'm going to have to check it out. and Worm. Bad to worse sounds quite accurate in a mortal world with sups. lol
Worm is exactly the kind of chaos that would exist with supers. Attempted mitigation and control, but those with selfish interests and villains often coming out on top, much like those in power and wealth in the real world. WtC has a lighter perspective to tell its story, but Worm is straight up “what if the most horrible person you can think of could also kill with a glance/touch/etc. With no consequence?” And worse. Here there be monsters, quite literally, and humanity is losing the battle.
It’s an absolutely incredible series and I’ve read the whole thing twice at this point, but it’s often very depressing, and the bad can be really bad.
If you want to read Worm there are web scrapers online that can convert it to an ebook format for easier reading, rather than needing to browse the parahumans site.
If you want to read Worm there are web scrapers online that can convert it to an ebook format for easier reading, rather than needing to browse the parahumans site.
It's on library Genesis. No need to reinvent the wheel.
Thanks, had no idea. I initially read it so long ago that “shadow libraries” weren’t much of a thing (if they existed at all yet?) and actually wrote my own scraper in Python to download it.
Worm is one of the few works I've seen with a lengthy, and justified, trigger warning list. For all the authors works, really. Heavy on bio-horror.
https://booktriggerwarnings.com/Worm_by_John_"Wildbow"_McCrae
The ending paragraph for Worm hits HARD, and I don't recommend reading the epilogue immediately after it for that reason (it's really more of a prologue for the sequel anyway)
IIRC Marvel has handwaved this through an actual government agency who's job is to fix shit quick. Department of Damage Control IIRC, very steeped in realist humor, and I mean actual school of realism not cult of "wahmenz in super hero movies is unrealistic!"
I would say it was commendable, but they ignore it completely when convenient and Civil War barely even scratched the surface of the concept in an actually story-impacting way.
It was a private company (owned partially by Wilson Fisk and Tony Stark) in the comics.
Realism is an inherently fascistic political ideology.
No, realism is looking at a fantastical setting from the frame of the mundane.
IE what a morning commute is like in a city running on magic
Associating daily mundanity with the real isn't very scientific. It's just a politically motivated false association designed to push a conservative agenda.
A working class centric narrative in a fantasy setting is pushing a conservative agenda?
No, calling it realism is pushing a conservative agenda. Because you're mixing up consensus reality, which is a bourgeois tool of oppression, with the experiences of the working class. Thereby normalising the oppression we face from the realist bourgeoisie.
It's like going around saying Star Wars is a piece of homophobic media just because Luke Skywalker is a farmer and you want to push a narrative that farmers are intrinsically homophobic. It's not true.
....city folks using a fantasy version of public transit is bourgeoisie oppression?
No, consensus reality is bourgeois oppression. It's continually served as a justification for genocides all over the world for hundreds of years
.....public transit is consensus reality?
Bro you're trying to see evil where there's just beige paint. Get a glass of water or something.
No, public transit isn't consensus reality. You're the one saying public transit is realism, I'm saying it isn't.
Invincible handles consequences pretty well.
One example: At one point Atom Eve uses her powers to turn an empty lot into a playground. But it turns out
spoiler
the lot was empty because the ground was unstable. So the playground collapses and injures several people.
Yea, Invincible is better than a lot in at least approaching the topic, though I didn't include it because the Global Defence Agency Cecil directs fixes things on a supernatural level. They magically fix up all sorts of things and magically make convincing cover stories, like the house blowing up like a freaking nuke as just a gas leak and the like.
Still nice that they're covering the topic, at least. It's so, SO much worse in the shows that just ignore it. Invincible does a good "meet in the middle": It's not really any big plot point of the show, but they also don't ignore the problems.
To their defense, the MCU kind of made a whole movie addressing exactly that, back when it was still really good
Yea, but I'd argue one movie out of 20+ is only as good as the dumb throwaway lines like, "Hey! We shouldn't fight here!" then proceeds to do nothing to move the fight...
Was that civil war? Because I thought that movie was terrible, Captain America's position was so dumb as portrayed in the movie. Maybe it made more sense in the comics or something but civil war is what made me stop watching MCU.
I think it was. The fumbled it a bit, but at least they kinda went in that direction.
Wasn't his position basically they didn't want to be under government control? Didn't seem so stupid to me but it's been a while since I watched it.
Stark argued that they needed to be accountable to the public, and Captain America argued that they couldn't be under "government control" (then what the hell is SHIELD lol). It seemed like an incredibly weak argument immediately following Age of Ultron, and very similar to proto-fascist "strongman" rhetoric.
I think the point was more that he didn't want the government to use them as a hit squad or stop them from going where they're needed. Shield was operating more a support organization than controlling them.
That was Captains pov, but Stark pointed out that it wasn't really working. This is immediately after Ultron, remember? And if it was in the real world, I wouldn't want those doofuses making unilateral decisions that affected the entire world without being accountable to anyone.
George R. R. Martin edited a terrific series called Wild Card that is really well grounded. The premise is an alien virus that gives people random mutations and some of them are horrific (the Jokers) but some get fantastic powers (the Aces).
It's pretty gritty and 'realistic' like they really go deep into how the various powers would realistically affect people and be used.
I really liked it up until
Tap for spoiler
one of the authors decided that ALL of the abilities and powers were all just forms of telekenesis , really sucked all the fun out of it!
Watch The Boys, it addresses collateral damage.
“Fuck supes”
Yea, The Boys is good shit, at least if the crassitude doesn't throw people off.
Chronicle probably doesn't exactly fit your description, but is an attempt at a more grounded look at superpeople.
Ohh Chronicle, haven't heard of that one. Going to have to check it out.
You are fortunate; it's not life changing or anything, but I wish I could watch it for the first time again.
This is also addressed in Hancock (2008).
"Sorry I let Dr Evil detonate a nuke in the city centre. Wouldn't want to cause a mess"
I mean, most decent superhero movies I see acknowledge inner city chaos to be bad. As soon as a horrible villain starts throwing fireballs, they’re trying to get civilians out, save people amidst chaos, etc.
There’s maybe another conversation to have on property damage; I think there’s not much story there due to the way insurance works. To us, these chaotic battles happen every summer, but in these worlds they’re rare freak occurrences - just like earthquakes.
Nah, that greatly depends on the universe. For an example of handling it badly, watch ... basically any of the DC universe live-action movies.
They're so bad that Batman regularly mercs people. Y'know, Batman. The guy who canonically takes issue with killing even violent terrorists actively killing others, let alone Security Guard #28201...
Superman gets thrown through buildings, uses laser eyes through buildings, etc, etc, and I shouldn't have to explain how Superman also takes issue with harming at least innocents. They might mention it, but then go on to have the city fight anyways with virtually none of their fighting actions indicating any reluctance...
I do NOT give them points for adding a throwaway line of, "You big meanie! We shouldn't fight in the city!"
I’m vaguely aware of that, but that’s also why I never really lined up for Zack Snyder movies on release. He has a uniquely ignorant take on those heroes.
I don't know if I'd call him ignorant (maybe willingly so) but more of the typical Hollywood dudebro that likes spectacle more than ... basic logic. Such a terrible lot of "creators"...
But Snyder is an artiste! 🙄😒
The Avengers went into this. The United States government went after them after they saved NYC for the destruction caused while saving NYC, and then eventually arrested all of them. It pissed me off quite a bit, considering the alternative was the enslavement of humanity. Short-sighted, power hungry politicians...
Super Crooks does this really well too if you haven't watched it. Its basically the boys in anime form (american anime style) and there are a few moments where colateral damage and even heroes racking up higher body counts than villains gets mentioned.
I hope more than just mentioned, but still sounds like a recommend worth checking out!
Hancock did pretty well adressing this
Invincible and One Punch Man to some extent.
The infinity saga at some point has this as a topic I believe, too.
Nah, that’s exactly what makes them awesome. I’m not trying to watch the news, I want some cool entertaining stuff, not more of the same life I already live. “Ooooh look the same stuff as the world around you! How interesting!” I’d just not watch a movie if I want that.
Have you seen Invincible?
You are imagining something that doesn't exist, because it's boring and stupid.
Look at the example I've already given, and the others people have already replied with.
"Realistic" is anything but just "watching the news" when written well.
Nah, what you’re calling realistic just ends up meaning the addition of economy & finances & politics to things I don’t really want it in. If I want to watch a political spy thriller I can do that, if I want to watch super heroes, I don’t always want it to account for all that. If a realistic movie includes super powers that’s awesome, stuff like The Boys or Watchmen; but I still want & enjoy the fun of a superhero movie having a set piece fight in the middle of New York, without having the movie go into the territory of insurance claims.