The club’s yearly dues were $31,500, and with travel and hotel expenses, the Arizona couple was spending close to $125,000 annually. Disney revoked their membership after an allegation that Scott Anderson was drunk in public.
As members of Disney’s exclusive Club 33, Scott and Diana Anderson visited the two Anaheim theme parks 60 to 80 times a year. The private club, with its wood-paneled trophy room and other amenities, was the center of their social life. They brought friends, acquaintances and business associates. As a couple, they went on the Haunted Mansion ride nearly 1,000 times. The club’s yearly dues were $31,500, and with travel and hotel expenses, the Arizona couple were spending close to $125,000 annually to get their Disney fix.
All of it came to an end in 2017, when Disney revoked their membership in the club after an allegation that Scott Anderson was drunk in public. Diana Anderson, a hardcore Disney aficionado since childhood, called it “a stab in the heart.” The Andersons, both 60, have spent the years since then — and hundreds of thousands of dollars — trying to get back into Club 33. On Tuesday, an Orange County jury rejected their claim that Disney ousted them improperly. It had taken the Andersons more than a decade to gain membership in Club 33, which includes access to exclusive lounges, dining, VIP tours and special events. They finally made it off the waiting list in 2012.
“My wife and I are both dead set that this is an absolute wrong, and we will fight this to the death,” Scott Anderson, who owns a golf course in Gilbert, Ariz., told The Times. “There is no way we’re letting this go.” He said the lawsuit has cost him about $400,000. “My retirement is set back five years,” he said. “I’m paying through the nose. Every day, I’m seeing another bill, and I’m about to keel over.” He said he will appeal. His wife said she wants to keep fighting. “I’ll sell a kidney,” Diana said. “I don’t care.”
Crassus had molten gold poured down his throat. this guy should have a tube stuffed into his mouth and be irrigated with what his golf course sucks up in a week
Small business owners are such terrible people, one of the greatest PR campaigns in history has been making them out to be wholesome new grandparents running like a corner store.
I wish i knew. How could you even have 125k a year for Disney shit? How could you just have 400k to throw away on your "na uh i wasn't drunk" vanity lawsuit?
I know its cause he owns a golf course and it was probably inherited money at some point. But it boggles my mind to imagine it honestly.
“My retirement is set back five years,” he said. “I’m paying through the nose. Every day, I’m seeing another bill, and I’m about to keel over.” He said he will appeal.
As once said, it's because most of them are born free as dolphins. They don't experience consequences like the poors do, so they don't have to learn restraint or tact outside of their little wine cave rituals.
The club’s yearly dues were $31,500, and with travel and hotel expenses, the Arizona couple were spending close to $125,000 annually to get their Disney fix.
All of it came to an end in 2017, when Disney revoked their membership in the club after an allegation that Scott Anderson was drunk in public.
This doesn't add up.
Being drunk in public doesn't seem like enough to me to throw away $125,000 per year, not to mention the extra business these two must have been bringing with them.
In the original complaint they claimed it was because they "were retaliated against for criticizing sexual harassment and other problems that arose as a result of new management."
But there may have simply been more money in getting rid of them. There's a waiting list to join, and initiation fees are $50,000.
were retaliated against for criticizing sexual harassment and other problems that arose as a result of new management
Ok so they were threatening Disney's ability to market the club and potentially bringing harm to Disney. They took the first opportunity available to cut them via the "drunk in public" excuse.
I can believe that Disney would consider allegations of sexual harrassment in a club with membership of this price to be worth more than $125k per year from one couple. Especially if they were crusading about it among other patrons because of a personal feud with new management or whatever.
Assuming the evidence for the allegations was flimsy and not something management could act on the easiest thing to do is to cut the source of the complaint. This will also ensure that other patrons don't complain too hard and understand that their membership can and will be revoked. Keeps them in line.
As an adult - I have zero interest in amusement parks but I can imagine somebody needing to go to one even though I think that's very sad. But I'll never understand any sort of "excusive" nonsense bullshit. I imagine the clubs are basically glorified Cracker Barrels where everything is at least 800% overpriced. Does anybody in this thread know anybody - even fourth hand - that's been in an exclusive Disney club?
I scrolled down to check out the comments. Have a look at this...
It’s pretty disturbing that most people don’t understand the significance of 33 and why he named it that.
The entire place is heavily masonic. It’s so sad. I used to love Disney so much and even considered looking into the residences at Golden Oak. Not anymore.
According to Disney, Club 33 is simply named after its address at 33 Royal Street in New Orleans Square at Disneyland. However, several others believe that there are other explanations behind the name. Some speculate that the name refers to 33 institutional patrons at Disneyland in 1966-1967 when the club was being built and opened.
I googled. Lots of photos here - Club 33 New-Look Photo Tour & Review - Disney Tourist Blog
This decour can only be described as bourgeoise. Colonial era bourgeoise.
According to Disney, Club 33 is simply named after its address at 33 Royal Street in New Orleans Square at Disneyland. However, several others believe that there are other explanations behind the name. Some speculate that the name refers to 33 institutional patrons at Disneyland in 1966-1967 when the club was being built and opened.
It doesn't escape me how similar 33 is to 88.
EDIT: And seeing the membership material only strengthens my suspicion that this is hitlerite shit
He could always jack up prices at his fancy dancy [Golf Course] to pay for it. I'm betting it's a lot more than "drunk in public" they aren't saying. Like that was the save face mild part of why they got the boot.