Literally dealing with that right now. The project manager is on site, and I thought that I'd finally have some backup on putting together this monster project. He's so far been asking a lot of questions legitimately trying to wrap his head around what he's seeing.
I'm the most (only) experienced person on the project and I don't like it.
I'd recommend telling the project manager exactly that. Ask him to schedule working sessions with you to start getting the project plan started. That way you can answer any questions they have during the meeting, and if not you two can note that as an action item for one of you to figure out. That first plan doesn't have to be perfect just a draft that's good enough to start seeing general resources needs and timeframes for those resources.
Your project manager is your friend as long as you are honest and upfront about what you require to accomplish your job.
Source: project manager since 2007, PMO leadership for the past 4 years.
Oh you see, this is a project that's been going on for years, and I started into it six months ago to get it done by 2025. It's not just a computer thing, but a robot with a lot of both hardware and software work. Naturally last month suddenly a lot of overhauls were made to the design, and since I've single handedly installed all of them, no one person except for me is familiar with exactly how everything fits together. The project plan and timeline is "get it done fasterer." At this point they will throw whatever material resources are needed to me, but we just don't have the personnel aside from me.
The project management is also not from the same continent as me, so meetings are a painful thing to schedule. The manager has finally come to the US to oversee the last round of acceptance work.
Right now the mechanicals are 99.9% done and I'm interacting remotely with software people to be their onsite hands.
The project manager is flittering around the room.
Both project managers at my company quit at the same time. Rather than replace the PMs, my employers are having us engineers figure out what customers want and all the dates. It's super hard! Yesterday I sat through an hour-long meeting for a project that never needed to happen... while my other projects are late.
So it turns out those guys were actually doing a lot of work, and spreading it out (to people who suck at it) was not a good idea. I actually enjoyed my job before this, and it's starting to feel like time for a change. In my experience it never gets better and you should always jump ship sooner rather than later.
Pm is the worst because in my experience you not only have to keep track of every little detail you also usually have to hold the customers hand through the process and if you're not experienced in doing that can create a lot of headaches.
Absolutely! But it also depends on the size of the company. Small companies can absolutely benefit from PMs. I used to take freelance clients as a engineer, and never accepted a job without a PM who was willing to block out the noise.
In big companies though, I have a lot of disdain for PMs.
Many literally spend most of their hours being the middleman between actual stakeholders. I recently had a project where the PM was just forwarding emails from one department lead to another. They didn't understand the product or cared to follow any processes. Then distracting my team for status updates so they can build reports in Excel.
Fortunately, our retros are heavily engineer-centric and we can give harsh feedback/fire our PMs, which we have done successfully over the past few years.
A good project manager is generally worth a couple of bodies they're helping manage. Unless your teams are all comprised of Superstars, they get more done with less.
So I ask Bert (my grey) every night "Are you ready?" before putting him to bed and I never really thought about it until the day he screamed it back at me as I was leaving for work one morning. I was in fact not ready at all and it was brutal coming from him.
I've had good project managers that really do make things run smoothly and take a ton of stress of the team. More often I've had the worse than useless ones that add workload rather than alleviate it.
One of my measures of how good a manager is would be how they come into a room. A good manager (I've had a few) will come in and silently assess how things are running (because they've already looked up info themselves) or ask specific questions that show they understand the state of things and are there to help if needed.
Pull the "how are things looking" crap, and the rating drops quickly. And the funny thing is, the ones who do that didn't actually want to hear the bad news I will eagerly pull up to drown them in. The look on their faces is worth it.
Basically, I can glean how much a manager knows about an operation by what first comes out of their mouth, and way too often it's not much that's useful.